Or bring young Clarke on who is a right back and put Perch in midfield.pemill wrote:broomo wrote:Gut wrenching.
We're 15 minutes away from every single poster on here coming on and saying what a brilliant performance, then a fluke, a mistake and a great finish and it's mainly doom and gloom.
We deserved to lose because we lost our heads.
We didn't deserve to lose because of the performance.
Thought Clarke, Quinn, Reid and Bowery had good games.
The lack of strikers on the bench dodn't cost us the game.
Mal Benning coming on and being absolutely raspberry did. Is that Nigel's fault? Possibly.
Benning is not a midfielder, totally alien to him, he would have been better slotting in at RB and let Perch go into midfield, or LB and McCoughlin into midfield.
Anyway, unbeaten run over, lets see how we react to that.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Ironically Bolton subbed their two most dangerous players and ended up winning the game.
yorkshire stag wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Ironically Bolton subbed their two most dangerous players and ended up winning the game.
Maddison always goes off at 60 mins
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Ironically Bolton subbed their two most dangerous players and ended up winning the game.
Maddison always goes off at 60 mins
He's only started two games for them Dave!
bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
Dan wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
No i don't think we would've done.Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
This. Losing that game had nothing to do with what was or wasn't on the bench tonight. We lost it because when Mal came on players didn't know where to go. I know this because it was happening 10 yards in front of me. Also if Benning doesn't come on he's not there to score an own goal. I didn't see any players tiring at all, they were all still up for it, encouraging each other and were on top still. We got undone by a fluke goal which made our heads go down. We then bring Mal on and players didn't know who was playing where. Less than 2 minutes later he is scoring an own goal.
If we don't make any subs we bring home all three points. Simple.
Dan wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
No i don't think we would've done.Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
This. Losing that game had nothing to do with what was or wasn't on the bench tonight. We lost it because when Mal came on players didn't know where to go. I know this because it was happening 10 yards in front of me. Also if Benning doesn't come on he's not there to score an own goal. I didn't see any players tiring at all, they were all still up for it, encouraging each other and were on top still. We got undone by a fluke goal which made our heads go down. We then bring Mal on and players didn't know who was playing where. Less than 2 minutes later he is scoring an own goal.
If we don't make any subs we bring home all three points. Simple.
Dan wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
No i don't think we would've done.Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
This. Losing that game had nothing to do with what was or wasn't on the bench tonight. We lost it because when Mal came on players didn't know where to go. I know this because it was happening 10 yards in front of me. Also if Benning doesn't come on he's not there to score an own goal. I didn't see any players tiring at all, they were all still up for it, encouraging each other and were on top still. We got undone by a fluke goal which made our heads go down. We then bring Mal on and players didn't know who was playing where. Less than 2 minutes later he is scoring an own goal.
If we don't make any subs we bring home all three points. Simple.
bobbystagsfan wrote:Dan wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
No i don't think we would've done.Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
This. Losing that game had nothing to do with what was or wasn't on the bench tonight. We lost it because when Mal came on players didn't know where to go. I know this because it was happening 10 yards in front of me. Also if Benning doesn't come on he's not there to score an own goal. I didn't see any players tiring at all, they were all still up for it, encouraging each other and were on top still. We got undone by a fluke goal which made our heads go down. We then bring Mal on and players didn't know who was playing where. Less than 2 minutes later he is scoring an own goal.
If we don't make any subs we bring home all three points. Simple.
Everyone was screaming for Benning to start over McLaughlin on Facebook too. Benning hasn't looked the same player since Flitcroft was here. Dunno if it's just me, just don't think he's good as he used to be.
BH_Stag wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Dan wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:Would we have lost if Quinn went off for Benning? who knows.
No i don't think we would've done.Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I don't think the bench cost us. I would not have brought Mal Benning on. It is hard for subs to come on and get up to speed in a game. Stephen Quinn was having his best game for the Stags. I would have left him on.
This. Losing that game had nothing to do with what was or wasn't on the bench tonight. We lost it because when Mal came on players didn't know where to go. I know this because it was happening 10 yards in front of me. Also if Benning doesn't come on he's not there to score an own goal. I didn't see any players tiring at all, they were all still up for it, encouraging each other and were on top still. We got undone by a fluke goal which made our heads go down. We then bring Mal on and players didn't know who was playing where. Less than 2 minutes later he is scoring an own goal.
If we don't make any subs we bring home all three points. Simple.
Everyone was screaming for Benning to start over McLaughlin on Facebook too. Benning hasn't looked the same player since Flitcroft was here. Dunno if it's just me, just don't think he's good as he used to be.
Nailed on to go to Port Vale in the summer.
Conker wrote:I’d still start Benning over McLaughlin, run of games he’s a better player.
Conker wrote:I’d still start Benning over McLaughlin, run of games he’s a better player.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, BH_Stag, Bing [Bot], bob ledgers barber, Cardiffstag23, Chrisuknottm, Cleveland_Stag, Drezden1, Martin Shaw, Nutty Stag, Paulstag, Rob, robda1st, Sneag, StanstedStag, Tidy, w12stag and 463 guests