Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:The crucial thing is though Dan. You're avoiding the debate now. I said decent win% not 45 or above. Fact of the matter is Flitcroft could have got us promoted and still retained the same win% he possesses now. All he needed was a draw vs mk dons. We wouldn't even be having this debate now. He still got us those play offs, Evans didn't. That is the crucial deciding factor between them both. The fact Flitcroft had us playing great stuff at time and 4 players in the team of the season further bolsters his claim.
You've got a win% as argument. It's your only valid argument. It's not solely enough. I'll take a lower win% and achieve something over 45% and achieve sod all.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record I’ll say it again because it’s clearly not sinking in. Winning games is THE most important thing to do as a football manager. That’s W I N N I N G. Something Flitcroft kept bottling which is why he’s still unemployed. I’m not avoiding a debate, there is no debate. Steve Evans is 5th in our best managers win % ratio FACT. IDGAF how you or Rob or anyone else want to twist it to suit your argument because you don’t like Evans, that’s a fact. Flitcroft and Evans both left the club with the team sitting in a play off place FACT. Flitcroft and Evans both achieved nothing, zilch, nada, they both failed with the biggest budgets the club have ever given a manager. They both left us in League Two. I’m sure you’ll type another 500 words of absoloute rubbish to try and say otherwise but I can’t be arsed anymore. Some of the stuff you’re coming out with is just embarrassing now, like winning not being solely enough to judge a manager on![]()
![]()
The length you go through to let people know you don't like flitcroft is mental, give it a rest you massive man child.
gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
Dan wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:The crucial thing is though Dan. You're avoiding the debate now. I said decent win% not 45 or above. Fact of the matter is Flitcroft could have got us promoted and still retained the same win% he possesses now. All he needed was a draw vs mk dons. We wouldn't even be having this debate now. He still got us those play offs, Evans didn't. That is the crucial deciding factor between them both. The fact Flitcroft had us playing great stuff at time and 4 players in the team of the season further bolsters his claim.
You've got a win% as argument. It's your only valid argument. It's not solely enough. I'll take a lower win% and achieve something over 45% and achieve sod all.
At the risk of sounding like a broken record I’ll say it again because it’s clearly not sinking in. Winning games is THE most important thing to do as a football manager. That’s W I N N I N G. Something Flitcroft kept bottling which is why he’s still unemployed. I’m not avoiding a debate, there is no debate. Steve Evans is 5th in our best managers win % ratio FACT. IDGAF how you or Rob or anyone else want to twist it to suit your argument because you don’t like Evans, that’s a fact. Flitcroft and Evans both left the club with the team sitting in a play off place FACT. Flitcroft and Evans both achieved nothing, zilch, nada, they both failed with the biggest budgets the club have ever given a manager. They both left us in League Two. I’m sure you’ll type another 500 words of absoloute rubbish to try and say otherwise but I can’t be arsed anymore. Some of the stuff you’re coming out with is just embarrassing now, like winning not being solely enough to judge a manager on![]()
![]()
The length you go through to let people know you don't like flitcroft is mental, give it a rest you massive man child.
Funny how you single me out yet say nothing about gazza and his obsession with Steve Evans. Bore off Walter.
Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
Paulstag wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
I doubt it.
Dan wrote:Paulstag wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:What obsession with Evans? I have no obsession with the guy. See I compare current managers to the best manager we've recently had. In my opinion it's Flitcroft, for a multitude of reasons. League wise the best for over 15 years. You think it's Evans because of one stat. It's certainly a valid stat, but only one. You think I'm dismissive of Evans because I think Flitcroft is better. Evans is a close 2nd but we need to go one better than Flitcroft, hence the comparisons.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
I doubt it.
Have you paid that money to charity yet you lying waster?
Paulstag wrote:Dan wrote:Paulstag wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
I doubt it.
Have you paid that money to charity yet you lying waster?
What money??? You got the right person or are you confused again?
Paulstag wrote:Dan wrote:Paulstag wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:
Has doing that knocked any sense into you yet?
I doubt it.
Have you paid that money to charity yet you lying waster?
What money??? You got the right person or are you confused again?
You know exactly what money Welbeckstag. You’re a disgrace.
Parkinsons Perm wrote:But you didn't deny being Welbeckstag and therefore you do owe the money you promised to charity. Lowest of the low
Dan wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:But you didn't deny being Welbeckstag and therefore you do owe the money you promised to charity. Lowest of the low
Exactly. Well said mate. Despicable excuse for a human being.
Paulstag wrote:Dan wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:But you didn't deny being Welbeckstag and therefore you do owe the money you promised to charity. Lowest of the low
Exactly. Well said mate. Despicable excuse for a human being.
I owe no money to charity, infact, i probably give more to charities than you do.
Karma catches up with people soon Dan, be wary of what you call people.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], mans_field, Martin Shaw, stewartstag and 276 guests