bigalstag wrote:And his qualifications for doing this would be what?
Too much influence as it is.
sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
WVStag wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
That might be in the top 3 of most ludicrous things ever said. Hymas has no football qualifications. He is a businessman and a businessman only.
victor A block wrote:Who is "Stev Hyman" ? Is he the guy responsible for keeping Joel Dempsey in a job?
sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
gazza1988 wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
The truth is he's told 2 previous managers publicly who he should and should not be playing also in Cox's case how he should play, those managers were Paul Cox and David Flitcroft. The David Flitcroft one I linked to in another post however the Paul Cox one went when we used to have to trim old posts to keep the message board running.
As for the last part of your post, I would not support this. 2 managers have ignored him, one got play off in his first full season and then the title in the second and the other got play offs in his first full season and was then sacked before he could go for his second full season. That much is true.
Rumour has it Hymas wanted him gone for JD so more of his youth team players (he's youth director) could come through. What Steve needs to realise is youth teamers will come through if good enough, there was a new rule introduced where each side must include at least 1 player who is homegrown by the club (exact wording is something like trained at the club for 3 years before their 21st birthday). Here's a nice fact for you, Hymas claimed Zayn Hakeem should have started last season in the run it to the end of the season, JD comes into the main post and released Hakeem!
arsene wengers coat wrote:gazza1988 wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
The truth is he's told 2 previous managers publicly who he should and should not be playing also in Cox's case how he should play, those managers were Paul Cox and David Flitcroft. The David Flitcroft one I linked to in another post however the Paul Cox one went when we used to have to trim old posts to keep the message board running.
As for the last part of your post, I would not support this. 2 managers have ignored him, one got play off in his first full season and then the title in the second and the other got play offs in his first full season and was then sacked before he could go for his second full season. That much is true.
Rumour has it Hymas wanted him gone for JD so more of his youth team players (he's youth director) could come through. What Steve needs to realise is youth teamers will come through if good enough, there was a new rule introduced where each side must include at least 1 player who is homegrown by the club (exact wording is something like trained at the club for 3 years before their 21st birthday). Here's a nice fact for you, Hymas claimed Zayn Hakeem should have started last season in the run it to the end of the season, JD comes into the main post and released Hakeem!
Reading between the lines, your suggesting that the current boss was employed as an easier conduit to the first team for the YT players. Something our last manager was reluctant to pursue during a promotion push.
Where in actual fact, our YT players haven't been good enough to warrant a first team place, signified by the current boss releasing a former YT hot prospect?
arsene wengers coat wrote:gazza1988 wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
The truth is he's told 2 previous managers publicly who he should and should not be playing also in Cox's case how he should play, those managers were Paul Cox and David Flitcroft. The David Flitcroft one I linked to in another post however the Paul Cox one went when we used to have to trim old posts to keep the message board running.
As for the last part of your post, I would not support this. 2 managers have ignored him, one got play off in his first full season and then the title in the second and the other got play offs in his first full season and was then sacked before he could go for his second full season. That much is true.
Rumour has it Hymas wanted him gone for JD so more of his youth team players (he's youth director) could come through. What Steve needs to realise is youth teamers will come through if good enough, there was a new rule introduced where each side must include at least 1 player who is homegrown by the club (exact wording is something like trained at the club for 3 years before their 21st birthday). Here's a nice fact for you, Hymas claimed Zayn Hakeem should have started last season in the run it to the end of the season, JD comes into the main post and released Hakeem!
Reading between the lines, your suggesting that the current boss was employed as an easier conduit to the first team for the YT players. Something our last manager was reluctant to pursue during a promotion push.
Where in actual fact, our YT players haven't been good enough to warrant a first team place, signified by the current boss releasing a former YT hot prospect?
Amber Andy wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:gazza1988 wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
The truth is he's told 2 previous managers publicly who he should and should not be playing also in Cox's case how he should play, those managers were Paul Cox and David Flitcroft. The David Flitcroft one I linked to in another post however the Paul Cox one went when we used to have to trim old posts to keep the message board running.
As for the last part of your post, I would not support this. 2 managers have ignored him, one got play off in his first full season and then the title in the second and the other got play offs in his first full season and was then sacked before he could go for his second full season. That much is true.
Rumour has it Hymas wanted him gone for JD so more of his youth team players (he's youth director) could come through. What Steve needs to realise is youth teamers will come through if good enough, there was a new rule introduced where each side must include at least 1 player who is homegrown by the club (exact wording is something like trained at the club for 3 years before their 21st birthday). Here's a nice fact for you, Hymas claimed Zayn Hakeem should have started last season in the run it to the end of the season, JD comes into the main post and released Hakeem!
Reading between the lines, your suggesting that the current boss was employed as an easier conduit to the first team for the YT players. Something our last manager was reluctant to pursue during a promotion push.
Where in actual fact, our YT players haven't been good enough to warrant a first team place, signified by the current boss releasing a former YT hot prospect?
If that is fact, then I'm saddened and shocked in equal measure.
The One wrote:Amber Andy wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:gazza1988 wrote:sunray wrote:On several topics there are references to Stev from being the person responsible for DF going and JD getting the job, the style of football we are playing etc.
What is the truth?
Personnally I would fully support him in mentoring a new manager like JD similiar to a Director of Football. But if that's the case JD is not listening.
The truth is he's told 2 previous managers publicly who he should and should not be playing also in Cox's case how he should play, those managers were Paul Cox and David Flitcroft. The David Flitcroft one I linked to in another post however the Paul Cox one went when we used to have to trim old posts to keep the message board running.
As for the last part of your post, I would not support this. 2 managers have ignored him, one got play off in his first full season and then the title in the second and the other got play offs in his first full season and was then sacked before he could go for his second full season. That much is true.
Rumour has it Hymas wanted him gone for JD so more of his youth team players (he's youth director) could come through. What Steve needs to realise is youth teamers will come through if good enough, there was a new rule introduced where each side must include at least 1 player who is homegrown by the club (exact wording is something like trained at the club for 3 years before their 21st birthday). Here's a nice fact for you, Hymas claimed Zayn Hakeem should have started last season in the run it to the end of the season, JD comes into the main post and released Hakeem!
Reading between the lines, your suggesting that the current boss was employed as an easier conduit to the first team for the YT players. Something our last manager was reluctant to pursue during a promotion push.
Where in actual fact, our YT players haven't been good enough to warrant a first team place, signified by the current boss releasing a former YT hot prospect?
If that is fact, then I'm saddened and shocked in equal measure.
Ditto. Astounding if true.
Amber Andy wrote:It would be foolish to play youngsters in the toxicity, that persists at Field Mill at the moment.
Youngsters will flourish better when the team is playing well.
If members of the board want the youth system to work and make some of the youn talent first team regulars they need to get things right on the field first. Otherwise they are doomed to fail.
It's a case of not putting the cart before the horse.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Frankenstag, La Manga Stag, mattstag14, Newhall1, Roger_Sausage and 455 guests