Big yella wrote:One has been a manager for 19 games and has a win rate of around 26%, and the other has 9 years experience, and a win rate of over 45% which includes four (4) promotions. Yet according to some on here it is trying to 'hound out' the current manager by saying that Clarke would have been a better appointment.
No people are not saying Clarke would have been a better appointment - they are saying them want him now. Well based on what I saw on Saturday it would be disastrous.