yorkshire stag wrote:nothing wrong with friendly little nudge of an email to remind them of the new offence though Marty !
It was the ‘friendly little nudge’ that started this embarrassing episode.
By embarrassing I meant for modern football.
yorkshire stag wrote:nothing wrong with friendly little nudge of an email to remind them of the new offence though Marty !
They should consider it. The Sweeney / Bowman incident clearly meets the criteria. If Bowman escapes punishment than it will be an injustice.Martin Shaw wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:ParisStag wrote:I don't think it's possible to retrospectively punish a player for diving.
yes it is
https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/foo ... 08806.htmlThe FA announced the introduction of the new offence in May to deal with cases where there is "clear and overwhelming evidence to suggest a match official has been deceived by an act of simulation, and as a direct result, the offending player's team has been awarded a penalty and/or an opposing player has been dismissed".
so do mtfc have to contact the FA or is it done automatically ?
it's nothing to do with MTFC. You'd have thought the commission would have considered it. Maybe more will come out.
bobbystagsfan wrote:bux46 wrote:Could it be possible to post that clip on their forum and show what cheating Bar stewards they support ???
most of the Exeter fans are defending Bowman saying he was violently elbowed in the stomach and that Sweeney will get an extra one game ban
Chadman wrote:It could have been so much more costly though. And where is Bowman's punishment? Time to cut this cheating cancer out of football now. It's plain embarrassing
https://www.chad.co.uk/sport/football/l ... -1-9974926
Chadman wrote:It could have been so much more costly though. And where is Bowman's punishment? Time to cut this cheating cancer out of football now. It's plain embarrassing
https://www.chad.co.uk/sport/football/l ... -1-9974926
Chadman wrote:It could have been so much more costly though. And where is Bowman's punishment? Time to cut this cheating cancer out of football now. It's plain embarrassing
https://www.chad.co.uk/sport/football/l ... -1-9974926
oldweststander wrote:Paulstag,
It is a common use of the word these days, nothing in it and not in bad taste.
Congratulations, for surviving that horrible illness, enjoy your football.
nick_stags wrote:oldweststander wrote:Paulstag,
It is a common use of the word these days, nothing in it and not in bad taste.
Congratulations, for surviving that horrible illness, enjoy your football.
Ok cool, as long as it's common and you don't find it in bad taste we're all good and that's the end of it.
cassellswasmagic wrote:Cancer is a group of diseases and no other use is correct, so Chadman is wrong. The use of the word in any other context is simply incorrect as a player feigning injury isn’t a disease. Use the word behaviour instead.
weststander wrote:Both my parents died, quite frankly, horrible deaths due to cancer.
When I read the sentence in question I didn't suddenly become offended or outraged.
I've also heard on the news over the years phrases like "the cancer of knife crime" etc
Why are people so quick to be offended by everything?
I'm off to have a lie down in a darkened room.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Bradders, Cardiffstag23, Elkesley Stag, Leigh5t, marksay, Martin Shaw, ST4GS, stewartstag, zod and 331 guests