Stags 2002 wrote:Carolyns clearly happy, i can only assume she's deflecting attention away from off field events with that picture though.
NG17_stag wrote:What a win. Did not expect anything at all today - might take that approach towards games more often. Absolutely buzzing for Demps (with everything that’s gone on) and Rose. Hopefully that win kicks things off, and with 2 consecutive home games coming up the league table could look very healthy. Plymouth losing shows the league is wide open again this season. We’re 2 points off top... makes you wonder why people were having a melt down 2 games in...
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Let's keep a clean sheet and 11 men on the pitch.
steiner wrote:Lets put all this recent negativity behind us with a smile inducing 2-0 win.
MTFCMusings wrote:God that team doesn’t inspire. Hopefully I’ll be proved wrong.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:gazza1988 wrote:I suspect 3-5-2.
Whute at CB and I assume one of Macca tomlinson and Bishop to be being the front 2. Likely MacDonald. However I can see this being very defensive with Rose and Maynard being isolated.
Alternatively Gordon can play right wing as well so could be 4-4-2, who gets to play left wing though is anyone's guess, probably Macca but Khan would have been a better starter over Macca (in any case in my opinion), then we could easily swap to 4-4-2 at any point. As it stands we need to make a sub to change it up. Or weaken ourselves with players out of position.
However you look at it, it is a dreadful midfield and a right back at CH when there's no need.
JD is already proving very uninspiring
Spiritater wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:gazza1988 wrote:I suspect 3-5-2.
Whute at CB and I assume one of Macca tomlinson and Bishop to be being the front 2. Likely MacDonald. However I can see this being very defensive with Rose and Maynard being isolated.
Alternatively Gordon can play right wing as well so could be 4-4-2, who gets to play left wing though is anyone's guess, probably Macca but Khan would have been a better starter over Macca (in any case in my opinion), then we could easily swap to 4-4-2 at any point. As it stands we need to make a sub to change it up. Or weaken ourselves with players out of position.
However you look at it, it is a dreadful midfield and a right back at CH when there's no need.
JD is already proving very uninspiring
What a drip
Woodclanger 1 wrote:tmwilson wrote:Khan is the only surprise to me. Just because the site states that this player has been replaced by that player it doesn't necessarily mean for the same position. White could play at right back in a back four or right in a back three. Looks a strong side to me. Players could be dropped for tactical reasons. Anyway, a win would be nice. God help us if we lose. I've already taken myself of the stags Facebook page.
Strong in what way?
Spiritater wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:tmwilson wrote:Khan is the only surprise to me. Just because the site states that this player has been replaced by that player it doesn't necessarily mean for the same position. White could play at right back in a back four or right in a back three. Looks a strong side to me. Players could be dropped for tactical reasons. Anyway, a win would be nice. God help us if we lose. I've already taken myself of the stags Facebook page.
Strong in what way?
In the way we won 2-0 you faithless clown
arsene wengers coat wrote:Been told it was a superb goal
Stags 2002 wrote:Carolyns clearly happy, i can only assume she's deflecting attention away from off field events with that picture though.
Sneag wrote:Stags 2002 wrote:Carolyns clearly happy, i can only assume she's deflecting attention away from off field events with that picture though.
Next thing she'll be moaning about sexism in football.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:Spiritater wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:tmwilson wrote:Khan is the only surprise to me. Just because the site states that this player has been replaced by that player it doesn't necessarily mean for the same position. White could play at right back in a back four or right in a back three. Looks a strong side to me. Players could be dropped for tactical reasons. Anyway, a win would be nice. God help us if we lose. I've already taken myself of the stags Facebook page.
Strong in what way?
In the way we won 2-0 you faithless clown
Ooooo been busy looking through for me, sad lad
Spiritater wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Spiritater wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:tmwilson wrote:Khan is the only surprise to me. Just because the site states that this player has been replaced by that player it doesn't necessarily mean for the same position. White could play at right back in a back four or right in a back three. Looks a strong side to me. Players could be dropped for tactical reasons. Anyway, a win would be nice. God help us if we lose. I've already taken myself of the stags Facebook page.
Strong in what way?
In the way we won 2-0 you faithless clown
Ooooo been busy looking through for me, sad lad
Casting judgement before we've kicked off, who's the sad one again?
Spiritater wrote:Full time!!! Be nice if you showed some faith/support during the game for a change
cassellswasmagic wrote:That comeback result at Newport looks a great point now. Plymouth couldn’t pick a point up there and other teams will struggle too.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Drezden1, dublin_stag, Frankenstag, Ralphy and 317 guests