arsene wengers coat wrote:If Bury go pop before the fixtures are announced, I don't see why clubs can't be reprieved or prompted to make up the numbers.
SINA STAG wrote:I can't see what is hard to understand it's simple written in the Queens English......
For the thickos on here......
If Bury fail to play their games next season
County will still be playing NON LEAGUE FOOTBALL
Simple......
Martin Shaw wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:Here’s the Rules:
" 12.2 Cessation of membership. If a Club (or Clubs) ceases to be a member of The League for any reason (including, without limitation, pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Association or by way of relegation or expulsion for disciplinary reasons):
12.2.3 …. during the period between the conclusion of the last Play-Off Match and the start of the following Season, its playing record shall not be expunged but the number of relegation places from the Division in which a Club would have played but for its cessation of membership, shall be reduced by the number of Clubs ceasing to be members and, during that Season, the relevant Division shall operate with a reduced number of Clubs.”
So If Bury cease to exist before the start of next season, then the number of relegation places from League 1 (the Division in which Bury would have played but for its cessation of membership) shall be reduced by one. League Two (the relevant Division for these purposes) will operate with 23 clubs.
So the fourth bottom team in League 1 gets to stay in League 1 and League 2 has only 23 clubs.
So we get one less game for our season tickets!
No.
The rules say "the relevant Division shall operate with a reduced number of Clubs.” Here the "relevant" Division (ie. "the Division in which a Club would have played") is League One, not League Two.
League One would therefore operate with 23 clubs, (and the number of relegation places from League One would be reduced by one).
bellwhiff wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:Here’s the Rules:
" 12.2 Cessation of membership. If a Club (or Clubs) ceases to be a member of The League for any reason (including, without limitation, pursuant to Article 4 of the Articles of Association or by way of relegation or expulsion for disciplinary reasons):
12.2.3 …. during the period between the conclusion of the last Play-Off Match and the start of the following Season, its playing record shall not be expunged but the number of relegation places from the Division in which a Club would have played but for its cessation of membership, shall be reduced by the number of Clubs ceasing to be members and, during that Season, the relevant Division shall operate with a reduced number of Clubs.”
So If Bury cease to exist before the start of next season, then the number of relegation places from League 1 (the Division in which Bury would have played but for its cessation of membership) shall be reduced by one. League Two (the relevant Division for these purposes) will operate with 23 clubs.
So the fourth bottom team in League 1 gets to stay in League 1 and League 2 has only 23 clubs.
So we get one less game for our season tickets!
No.
The rules say "the relevant Division shall operate with a reduced number of Clubs.” Here the "relevant" Division (ie. "the Division in which a Club would have played") is League One, not League Two.
League One would therefore operate with 23 clubs, (and the number of relegation places from League One would be reduced by one).
Clearly the Conference operate under different rules as Aldershot have been reprieved from relegation after Gateshead were punished.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Bury to make 10-12 employees redundant and staff are accused by the new owner Steve Dale (SD2) of trying to extort money from the club by insisting on being paid their wages instead of just leaving and finding jobs elsewhere!!
https://www.burytimes.co.uk/news/177020 ... ef=mr&lp=3
Steve Dale: "If you read my past statements I indeed made clear that staff will be let go as we are overstaffed. That’s just commercial sense. What you should be asking is, these staff who are purporting to love the club, why didn’t they just go and find other jobs? But no, they are trying to extort money from the club."
oldweststander wrote:Come on guys, these employees are owed wages, unpaid for some time, why should they turn their backs and walk away when jobs are not that easy to find.
I know from experience, to walk away from work volunterily is considered by the DWP to be deliberately rendering yourself unemployed and therefore not eligable for any benefits for about 12 weeks.
Chander Lear wrote:oldweststander wrote:Come on guys, these employees are owed wages, unpaid for some time, why should they turn their backs and walk away when jobs are not that easy to find.
I know from experience, to walk away from work volunterily is considered by the DWP to be deliberately rendering yourself unemployed and therefore not eligable for any benefits for about 12 weeks.
Agree.
Just because you have a love for a club, the bills still need to be paid. Can't blame the staff for bad staffing management.
Marky Mark wrote:https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/48761650
Football creditors owed £950k, paid in full out of owners own pocket
Non football creditors owed £6m, including £3.6m, paid 25%
So the owner pays the football creditors off with the 25% he gets back and the club become debt free and 12 points worse off.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, broomo, Butch, Elkesley Stag, Hon Sec, mansfieldarmy, Nutty Stag and 297 guests