Martin Shaw wrote:Unfortunate for Newport today. If there had been VAR, then Matt would have got the penalty after 85 minutes and Newport would probably have won.
However if we'd had VAR in the semi-finals, then O'Brien would have been sent off in the first leg after 6 minutes, and Azeez would not have got the penalty after 83 minutes of the first leg. Two tie-changing decisions. And Butler would probably have been sent off in the second leg.
Martin Shaw wrote:Unfortunate for Newport today. If there had been VAR, then Matt would have got the penalty after 85 minutes and Newport would probably have won.
However if we'd had VAR in the semi-finals, then O'Brien would have been sent off in the first leg after 6 minutes, and Azeez would not have got the penalty after 83 minutes of the first leg. Two tie-changing decisions. And Butler would probably have been sent off in the second leg.
Sedgwick wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:Unfortunate for Newport today. If there had been VAR, then Matt would have got the penalty after 85 minutes and Newport would probably have won.
However if we'd had VAR in the semi-finals, then O'Brien would have been sent off in the first leg after 6 minutes, and Azeez would not have got the penalty after 83 minutes of the first leg. Two tie-changing decisions. And Butler would probably have been sent off in the second leg.
Don't think VAR would of given them a penalty. It wasn't a clear and obvious mistake. Matt planted his foot and threw himself to the ground. Almost a carbon copy of Patrick bamford against Richard Keogh in the championship play offs, he was booked for a dive. Matt should have been too.
pemill wrote:As much as I hate to see it, we have to get smartly (not Danny Rose, captain obvious style) into this cheating lark, it is a big part of today’s game. We so nearly got there playing football, maybe, just maybe an Ajeez, Matt or Akinde style fall over in the box would have got us that extra point.
Martin Shaw wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:Unfortunate for Newport today. If there had been VAR, then Matt would have got the penalty after 85 minutes and Newport would probably have won.
However if we'd had VAR in the semi-finals, then O'Brien would have been sent off in the first leg after 6 minutes, and Azeez would not have got the penalty after 83 minutes of the first leg. Two tie-changing decisions. And Butler would probably have been sent off in the second leg.
Don't think VAR would of given them a penalty. It wasn't a clear and obvious mistake. Matt planted his foot and threw himself to the ground. Almost a carbon copy of Patrick bamford against Richard Keogh in the championship play offs, he was booked for a dive. Matt should have been too.
They spoke to Dermot Gallagher on Sky. He said it should have been given as a penalty and would have been under VAR.
Sedgwick wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:Unfortunate for Newport today. If there had been VAR, then Matt would have got the penalty after 85 minutes and Newport would probably have won.
However if we'd had VAR in the semi-finals, then O'Brien would have been sent off in the first leg after 6 minutes, and Azeez would not have got the penalty after 83 minutes of the first leg. Two tie-changing decisions. And Butler would probably have been sent off in the second leg.
Don't think VAR would of given them a penalty. It wasn't a clear and obvious mistake. Matt planted his foot and threw himself to the ground. Almost a carbon copy of Patrick bamford against Richard Keogh in the championship play offs, he was booked for a dive. Matt should have been too.
They spoke to Dermot Gallagher on Sky. He said it should have been given as a penalty and would have been under VAR.
Just his opinion. It was a dive, exactly the same thing happened in the Leeds game and it was free kick the other way? Quite glad we don't have VAR.
I've heard goal line technology will be used in leagues one and two soon. That I can get behind
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:I wonder what odds you could get on Newport doing a County next season and going from play offs to relegation.
They should have made enough money to avoid a bottom three budget though. It probably depends on them not thinking they are big time charlies though and getting rid of most of the squad.
But wouldn't it be funny. And before anyone points it out, no I don't think it will happen to us.
bellwhiff wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:I wonder what odds you could get on Newport doing a County next season and going from play offs to relegation.
They should have made enough money to avoid a bottom three budget though. It probably depends on them not thinking they are big time charlies though and getting rid of most of the squad.
But wouldn't it be funny. And before anyone points it out, no I don't think it will happen to us.
Hope so. They don’t deserve to be in the English league system. I’d even rather see Chesterfailed in L2 rather than them.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bob ledgers barber, Chacawab, La Manga Stag, Leigh5t, Martin Shaw, Nutty Stag, Stagnant, Stags Head Stags, yorkstag and 315 guests