yorkshire stag wrote:my only criticism was the the timing the subs came on, should have been made at 70 mins imo
Spot on. Agree 100%
yorkshire stag wrote:my only criticism was the the timing the subs came on, should have been made at 70 mins imo
part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
yorkshire stag wrote:part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
“could a, would a, should a”, as my old Gran would say !
part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
Wouldn't our number have been different?
part time pete wrote:Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
Wouldn't our number have been different?
No
Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
Wouldn't our number have been different?
No
You sure?
Martin Shaw wrote:Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Sneag wrote:part time pete wrote:Would have been Newcastle at home in third round
Wouldn't our number have been different?
No
You sure?
Pete is right.
eggy wrote:For the 3rd round, balls 1-44 are Prem + Champ teams in alphabetical order, then balls 45-64 are the 2nd round winners (based on the order they were drawn in the 2nd round draw I think).
Spiritater wrote:We are out, my interest in t'Cup ends here.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Paulstag, StanstedStag and 400 guests