yorkshire stag wrote:we are through
part time pete wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:we are through
It will be an away tie though, as no matter what result of the Grimsby vs Man City game in November, we will finish second in the group.
Rob wrote:part time pete wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:we are through
It will be an away tie though, as no matter what result of the Grimsby vs Man City game in November, we will finish second in the group.
Unless we get an u21 side?
part time pete wrote:Rob wrote:part time pete wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:we are through
It will be an away tie though, as no matter what result of the Grimsby vs Man City game in November, we will finish second in the group.
Unless we get an u21 side?
True
STAGS FOR LIFE wrote::) 7.45 k/o
Barrow 3 v Colchester 1
Tranmere 0 v Stockport 0
The One wrote:STAGS FOR LIFE wrote::) 7.45 k/o
Barrow 3 v Colchester 1
Tranmere 0 v Stockport 0
Put scores in for you
Sneag wrote:The Sand Dancers don't look bad TBF.
Their main stand reminds me of the old stand at Saltergate
MTFCMusings wrote:Bit worrying to see Swindon getting battered 4-0 with the same side that beat us.
Sneag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Bit worrying to see Swindon getting battered 4-0 with the same side that beat us.
Cos that's exactly how football works.
MTFCMusings wrote:Sneag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Bit worrying to see Swindon getting battered 4-0 with the same side that beat us.
Cos that's exactly how football works.
Well no but still. There style was all wrong for us. Whereas if we could play Barrow away every week we’d be invincible
Sneag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Sneag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Bit worrying to see Swindon getting battered 4-0 with the same side that beat us.
Cos that's exactly how football works.
Well no but still. There style was all wrong for us. Whereas if we could play Barrow away every week we’d be invincible
I though Swindon looked a bit shakey at the back against us. Stockport must have opted not to hit the self destruct button.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 179 guests