Bros wrote:And who is going to pay for any of these grandiose schemes? I am sure JR has plans in mind to redevelop Bishop St when it is needed. At the moment it is a good source of income from advertising, far more revenue than would be received from spectators being in the stand. I am sure JR would appreciate financial input from the stadium designers on this message board
Rob wrote:Bros wrote:And who is going to pay for any of these grandiose schemes? I am sure JR has plans in mind to redevelop Bishop St when it is needed. At the moment it is a good source of income from advertising, far more revenue than would be received from spectators being in the stand. I am sure JR would appreciate financial input from the stadium designers on this message board
You say "when it's needed", Bradford have sold out today, who knows how many more they could have sold if we were able to accommodate them in a redeveloped Bishop, an extra 1k is 20k on gate receipts, plus food etc. Yes it will take a while to recoup the outlay, but I do think it is needed now.
Rob wrote:Bros wrote:And who is going to pay for any of these grandiose schemes? I am sure JR has plans in mind to redevelop Bishop St when it is needed. At the moment it is a good source of income from advertising, far more revenue than would be received from spectators being in the stand. I am sure JR would appreciate financial input from the stadium designers on this message board
You say "when it's needed", Bradford have sold out today, who knows how many more they could have sold if we were able to accommodate them in a redeveloped Bishop, an extra 1k is 20k on gate receipts, plus food etc. Yes it will take a while to recoup the outlay, but I do think it is needed now.
Dave Wayne wrote:Rob wrote:Bros wrote:And who is going to pay for any of these grandiose schemes? I am sure JR has plans in mind to redevelop Bishop St when it is needed. At the moment it is a good source of income from advertising, far more revenue than would be received from spectators being in the stand. I am sure JR would appreciate financial input from the stadium designers on this message board
You say "when it's needed", Bradford have sold out today, who knows how many more they could have sold if we were able to accommodate them in a redeveloped Bishop, an extra 1k is 20k on gate receipts, plus food etc. Yes it will take a while to recoup the outlay, but I do think it is needed now.
So that's £20k how many times a year ? 3 maybe ?
Knock off the staffing costs and call it a nice round £50k a season.
How much would a basic stand cost ? £1m ?
It would only take 20 years to break even then !!
Dave Wayne wrote:Rob wrote:Bros wrote:And who is going to pay for any of these grandiose schemes? I am sure JR has plans in mind to redevelop Bishop St when it is needed. At the moment it is a good source of income from advertising, far more revenue than would be received from spectators being in the stand. I am sure JR would appreciate financial input from the stadium designers on this message board
You say "when it's needed", Bradford have sold out today, who knows how many more they could have sold if we were able to accommodate them in a redeveloped Bishop, an extra 1k is 20k on gate receipts, plus food etc. Yes it will take a while to recoup the outlay, but I do think it is needed now.
So that's £20k how many times a year ? 3 maybe ?
Knock off the staffing costs and call it a nice round £50k a season.
How much would a basic stand cost ? £1m ?
It would only take 20 years to break even then !!
Sneag wrote:Speaking of advertising on the Bish, our lass was offered a hoarding on there but turned it down on the basis that it looks such a mess any sign she had would be lost amongst the dozens of boards already in place.
Are the club over selling the space, would charging more for fewer boards on a completed stand genterate more money?
arsene wengers coat wrote:Sneag wrote:Speaking of advertising on the Bish, our lass was offered a hoarding on there but turned it down on the basis that it looks such a mess any sign she had would be lost amongst the dozens of boards already in place.
Are the club over selling the space, would charging more for fewer boards on a completed stand genterate more money?
Why don't we just not bother with any seats for spectators or any stands or a stadium for that matter and just put advertising signs up everywhere?
gazza1988 wrote:Isn't one of the caveats of the grant money that paid for the stadium that it was to be seating only?
Whether that's just the stands that it was used on or not I don't know.
Spiritater wrote:A stand we don't need, or a CB we do need... which would be of more benefit in our current division?
Chacawab wrote:A peek through the fence on Thursday and it looked like the old one is being dismantled. Hoorah!
Amberheart wrote:Chacawab wrote:A peek through the fence on Thursday and it looked like the old one is being dismantled. Hoorah!
We wish!
halifaxstag wrote:Amberheart wrote:Chacawab wrote:A peek through the fence on Thursday and it looked like the old one is being dismantled. Hoorah!
We wish!
Your wish is granted. They had already started taking some of the panels off before Saturday. It was partly covered with black cloth during the match.
halifaxstag wrote:Amberheart wrote:Chacawab wrote:A peek through the fence on Thursday and it looked like the old one is being dismantled. Hoorah!
We wish!
Your wish is granted. They had already started taking some of the panels off before Saturday. It was partly covered with black cloth during the match.
Dan wrote:
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, Bing [Bot], Cardiffstag23, Martin Shaw, RabMood, Stags Head Stags, Stoney, Tidy, Tre Cool and 319 guests