Dan wrote:Do we think the issue is fitness? Cambridge looked fitter than us yesterday especially towards the end of the game.
Dan wrote:oldweststander wrote:Dan wrote:So the bench was “too weak” a few days ago yet today the only bright spots were two players coming off our “weak bench”. I love this place
Dan, the point that was made following the Bolton defeat was the bench was so weak Nigel wouldn't use it.?
But he did use it and that’s what cost us the game.
Dan wrote:Do we think the issue is fitness? Cambridge looked fitter than us yesterday especially towards the end of the game.
Dan wrote:Do we think the issue is fitness? Cambridge looked fitter than us yesterday especially towards the end of the game.
oldweststander wrote:Dan wrote:oldweststander wrote:Dan wrote:So the bench was “too weak” a few days ago yet today the only bright spots were two players coming off our “weak bench”. I love this place
Dan, the point that was made following the Bolton defeat was the bench was so weak Nigel wouldn't use it.?
But he did use it and that’s what cost us the game.
Benning, no one else. You are letting yourself down Dan with comments like that.
bigalstag1 wrote:Respect Nigel, but to say we matched them for most of the game is just pure fantasy. When the pressure is on,this team crumbles, especially at home, and has done for the last two seasons.
MTFCMusings wrote:bigalstag1 wrote:Respect Nigel, but to say we matched them for most of the game is just pure fantasy. When the pressure is on,this team crumbles, especially at home, and has done for the last two seasons.
I think we matched them. They were just better in both boxes. Reid missed a free header, Mullin converted a free shot. Knibbs hit the target with a shot from just inside the box, Bowery curled his wide. Mullin beat the keeper at the far post, Reid hit the keeper who was already on the floor.
MTFCMusings wrote:Dan wrote:part time pete wrote:Did we beat Cambridge on xG's
You just had to didn’t you?!
1.3 v 1.3
part time pete wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Dan wrote:part time pete wrote:Did we beat Cambridge on xG's
You just had to didn’t you?!
1.3 v 1.3
So this means they have a better shot stopper than us or a better goal scorer.
Oh look, who is top of the goal scoring charts.
I thought there were two even sides yesterday except for the goal scorer, which proves the xG’s theory.
Torrystag wrote:nice cameo appearance edders,probably my favourite poster on here
Torrystag wrote:Tis true most think they are jamie carragher ,or gary neville ,i like a nice simple one liner or a killer put down
EdwinstoweStag wrote:Torrystag wrote:Tis true most think they are jamie carragher ,or gary neville ,i like a nice simple one liner or a killer put down
I am struggling to complete a whole line about our performance against Harrogate.
georgefostersbeard wrote:So let's hope the positive from that game was that Law is ready for a league start and he lives up to the expectations
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: dublin_stag and 301 guests