Dan wrote:And you could also chuck a few grand in on a signing on fee if it’s spare. That could determine whether or not a player signs.
Signing on fees are included in the salary cap.
Dan wrote:And you could also chuck a few grand in on a signing on fee if it’s spare. That could determine whether or not a player signs.
Rob wrote:I've not tested it but I see no reason why the FA player would not work on a smart tv via the tv's internet browser.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Dan wrote:And you could also chuck a few grand in on a signing on fee if it’s spare. That could determine whether or not a player signs.
Signing on fees are included in the salary cap.
PEAR CIDER wrote:I cannot believe in this day and age the FA player sign-up asks if you are male or female without the option for non-binary.
Martin Shaw wrote:
MTFCMusings wrote:Will be a tough game. Cheltenham a very good side, albeit out of form recently.
Martin Shaw wrote:one f in mansfield wrote:I’ve just registered . Not sure what for though . Will I be able to watch on my tv or will I have to use the lead from laptop to tv like I do for iFollow. Last round I flicked around bbc channels till I found the game but I never registered for anything . Is this round different?
yes, this round is different. It is not on TV. Though you can connect your laptop to your TV via an HDMI lead.
it's live on the FA Player
https://faplayer.thefa.com/home/all
You have to register for a free account. There is also an app you can download if watching on tablet or smartphone. Or you can just watch on the website.
It is only available in the UK. If you are outside the UK (or indeed in the UK), then you can listen to commentary on iFollow with me and Dean.
The One wrote:Ref is Lee Swaybe
Wh_Stag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Will be a tough game. Cheltenham a very good side, albeit out of form recently.
I think we've already shown we can more than match them, there was nothing in the 0-0 draw
Rob wrote:I've not tested it but I see no reason why the FA player would not work on a smart tv via the tv's internet browser.
G B wrote:Rob wrote:I've not tested it but I see no reason why the FA player would not work on a smart tv via the tv's internet browser.
I initially tried to do this with ifollow but for whatever reason it wouldn't work directly with the smart TV Internet browser. However when I use the app browser on my Amazon firestick , which is connected to the same TV, there are no issues and this is how I have watched games this season.
No idea why this should be or if the FA Player will have the same outcomes but thought it was worth mentioning as another way of potentially viewing the game via the TV if people have Amazon firesticks.
Rob wrote:G B wrote:Rob wrote:I've not tested it but I see no reason why the FA player would not work on a smart tv via the tv's internet browser.
I initially tried to do this with ifollow but for whatever reason it wouldn't work directly with the smart TV Internet browser. However when I use the app browser on my Amazon firestick , which is connected to the same TV, there are no issues and this is how I have watched games this season.
No idea why this should be or if the FA Player will have the same outcomes but thought it was worth mentioning as another way of potentially viewing the game via the TV if people have Amazon firesticks.
I've watched the last 3 games on my tv via I follow. Though I had some connection issues on Tues, the picture quality has been excellent. Odd that it works on your firestick, which I think uses Android, but not your tv browser. My tv is an LG and about a year old, I wonder if it's to do with the make if tv or age?
Birminghamstag10 wrote:Rob wrote:G B wrote:Rob wrote:I've not tested it but I see no reason why the FA player would not work on a smart tv via the tv's internet browser.
I initially tried to do this with ifollow but for whatever reason it wouldn't work directly with the smart TV Internet browser. However when I use the app browser on my Amazon firestick , which is connected to the same TV, there are no issues and this is how I have watched games this season.
No idea why this should be or if the FA Player will have the same outcomes but thought it was worth mentioning as another way of potentially viewing the game via the TV if people have Amazon firesticks.
I've watched the last 3 games on my tv via I follow. Though I had some connection issues on Tues, the picture quality has been excellent. Odd that it works on your firestick, which I think uses Android, but not your tv browser. My tv is an LG and about a year old, I wonder if it's to do with the make if tv or age?
Rob - with regards watching on a firestick, is that via the browser or have amazon added the ifollow app to the Amazon store? I haven't checked in ages but I couldn't find the app, and when I tried through the browser it wouldn't play.
I bought a cheap android box which does the trick but I bet the firestick would be better.
quick edit - I think there's only a few true android TVs on the market. Sony do a few and Hi Sense do too. Most other manufacturers have their own app stores, which generally are pretty rubbish in terms of content.
Martin Shaw wrote:This is the how much we've made from the FA Cup so far, in the scenario where we win on Sunday, and where we lose:
If we win:
The Stags have therefore made £154,500 from the FA Cup run so far (broadcast money: Rd1 £18,000; Rd2 £12,500; Rd 3 £20,000; prize money: Rd1 £16,972; Rd2 £25,500; Rd 3 £61,500).
If we lose:
The Stags have therefore made £113,500 from the FA Cup run (broadcast money: Rd1 £18,000; Rd2 £12,500; Rd 3 £20,000; prize money: Rd1 £16,972; Rd2 £25,500; Rd 3 £20,500).
Curry 9 Brace 7 wrote:Cloughies got them in good form, they'll be up for it I reckon. Bet they can't wait for Sunday.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bradders, Cardiffstag23, Martin Shaw, ParisStag, Sandy Pate Best Stag, Sneag and 306 guests