Dave Wayne wrote:GC came to us leading into the xmas period when games came thick and fast so there wasnt much time on the training ground.
Now he has had the opportunity to mould the squad in training and in the transfer market there are signs of improvement in the performances.
Yes it went wrong at the end yesterday, but we have taken 4 points from 3 games this week. If we continue doing that for the rest of the season we will end up on 51 points which is safety, the remit I expect he was given on arrival.
We can't judge GC for at least another year as he has taken over a poorly performing squad in mid season. Get off his back and give him time.
CassellsCap wrote:The eleven picked to start should be on for 90 mins or don’t pick them. Subs for players injured is obvious but making changes is because the selection wasn’t right to start with and that’s down to whoever picks the team...making subs nowadays is just a way for a manager to try and right his wrongs.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:... with 10 minutes to go by bringing Psycho Prezzer on. The defence had been playing well. However the late equalizer was due to Ryan Sweeney conceding the free kick and Mal Benning missing the first header.
Martin Shaw wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:... with 10 minutes to go by bringing Psycho Prezzer on. The defence had been playing well. However the late equalizer was due to Ryan Sweeney conceding the free kick and Mal Benning missing the first header.
ie. It was nothing to do with bringing Preston on.
Exactly. Thing is some fans have to have a scapegoat. Logan has gone so it's Preston now.Martin Shaw wrote:There were four players who could have done better to prevent the equaliser. And none of them was Preston.
Amber Andy wrote:Exactly. Thing is some fans have to have a scapegoat. Logan has gone so it's Preston now.Martin Shaw wrote:There were four players who could have done better to prevent the equaliser. And none of them was Preston.
The facts don't seem to come into it..
If Logan was still with us and had conceded those goals he would have been slaughtered on here.
Martin Shaw wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:... with 10 minutes to go by bringing Psycho Prezzer on. The defence had been playing well. However the late equalizer was due to Ryan Sweeney conceding the free kick and Mal Benning missing the first header.
ie. It was nothing to do with bringing Preston on.
MTFCMusings wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:Tippy Tappy Football wrote:... with 10 minutes to go by bringing Psycho Prezzer on. The defence had been playing well. However the late equalizer was due to Ryan Sweeney conceding the free kick and Mal Benning missing the first header.
ie. It was nothing to do with bringing Preston on.
On Preston, he was not at fault for the goal, but I’m trying to understand the logic behind bringing him on. Given GC told the press recently that Preston had come to him saying he really need help due to poor form, is he really someone you want to be bringing on to sure up a defence that had conceded one fluke goal from a cross in nearly two games before that, especially considering Preston has given away at least two goals since GC arrived?
MTFCMAD wrote:The equaliser was definitely nothing to do with Preston him self. What I’m alluding to was the subsitution was a factor in the equalising goal. It caused players to change position for the last and most important/pressurised ten minutes of the game.
Imo the fault of the 2 goal surrender were down to a bad GK mistake and poor substitutions and tactics from the manager.
daddycool wrote:If we keep giving away stupid fouls around the area we will always struggle ,the first goal a fluke the second from a foul. .
Agreed ,Preston substitution was strange but he had nothing to do with the goals
diablo wrote:I doubt that there was one fan at the match today who understood the Managers tactics in the last 10 minutes of the game . Cruising at 2-0 he changes the pattern and two goals are conceded. Totally negative in my opinion..Mr Coughlin hasn't anyone ever told you the best form of defence is attack. We should have been going for the third goal and not going defensive. Why have you stopped leaving 2 attackers up tops when the opposition get a corner? Today Carlisle's final attack saw 21 players in the box and virtually every supporter knew we were odds on to concede , everyone except you.
MTFCMusings wrote:Sweeney wouldn’t have been on the left had he not made the chance, so you can’t say it had no impact. Literally every post about it has not blamed Preston for the goal, they’re just saying it was a pointless substitution, done for the sake of it.
yorkstag wrote:diablo wrote:I doubt that there was one fan at the match today who understood the Managers tactics in the last 10 minutes of the game . Cruising at 2-0 he changes the pattern and two goals are conceded. Totally negative in my opinion..Mr Coughlin hasn't anyone ever told you the best form of defence is attack. We should have been going for the third goal and not going defensive. Why have you stopped leaving 2 attackers up tops when the opposition get a corner? Today Carlisle's final attack saw 21 players in the box and virtually every supporter knew we were odds on to concede , everyone except you.
And your coaching qualifications are ??
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 265 guests