tibby wrote:Who cares? Mellis is the most over rated player we have ever had
arsene wengers coat wrote:bellwhiff wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Definate time for this Donohue fella.
Are you a qualified criminal lawyer AWC?
I wouldn’t think so with that spelling.
Sorry Dad. I must spell definitely correctly to be a qualified criminal lawyer or get into the Army.
arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
It'll depend on what bad character gets introduced, at what point they enter a guilty plea (if they do), how long the trial takes & how long they persist with a provable lie and what mood the judge is in when it comes to sentencing. They do seem to like to make examples of footballers.
tibby wrote:Who cares? Mellis is the most over rated player we have ever had
NorthLondonStag wrote:Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
It'll depend on what bad character gets introduced, at what point they enter a guilty plea (if they do), how long the trial takes & how long they persist with a provable lie and what mood the judge is in when it comes to sentencing. They do seem to like to make examples of footballers.
You can’t introduce bad character for sentencing, only previous convictions.
The length of the trial is not relevant.
I agree the judge’s mood may be highly relevant although they still have to apply the sentencing guidelines.
Hjeldefan wrote:tibby wrote:Who cares? Mellis is the most over rated player we have ever had
This. He makes a 10 yard pass and half our fan base think he is Paul Scholes.
Sneag wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
It'll depend on what bad character gets introduced, at what point they enter a guilty plea (if they do), how long the trial takes & how long they persist with a provable lie and what mood the judge is in when it comes to sentencing. They do seem to like to make examples of footballers.
You can’t introduce bad character for sentencing, only previous convictions.
The length of the trial is not relevant.
I agree the judge’s mood may be highly relevant although they still have to apply the sentencing guidelines.
Previous convictions point to bad character shirley.
The length of the trial can have a direct impact on the judge's mood.
NorthLondonStag wrote:Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
It'll depend on what bad character gets introduced, at what point they enter a guilty plea (if they do), how long the trial takes & how long they persist with a provable lie and what mood the judge is in when it comes to sentencing. They do seem to like to make examples of footballers.
You can’t introduce bad character for sentencing, only previous convictions.
The length of the trial is not relevant.
I agree the judge’s mood may be highly relevant although they still have to apply the sentencing guidelines.
Big yella wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:arsene wengers coat wrote:Noted.
But what you reckon? Donohue will get time, Mellis won't?
I’m not sure of the actual evidence but I would suspect it’ll be a suspended sentence
It'll depend on what bad character gets introduced, at what point they enter a guilty plea (if they do), how long the trial takes & how long they persist with a provable lie and what mood the judge is in when it comes to sentencing. They do seem to like to make examples of footballers.
You can’t introduce bad character for sentencing, only previous convictions.
The length of the trial is not relevant.
I agree the judge’s mood may be highly relevant although they still have to apply the sentencing guidelines.
"In January 2012, Donohue pleaded guilty at Caernarfon Magistrates Court to a charge of assaulting a woman at a nightclub in Bangor, Gwynedd, the previous 13 November. He was fined £500 and £85 court fees, and sentenced to 120 hours of community service and four weeks of curfew."
I would say that that is all that needs to be said to confirm his bad character.
Big yella wrote:That's the stage he is at belly, he's pleaded guilty.
Bradders wrote:Ban him from all pubs and bars for three weeks. Force him to stay at home, except for essential journeys or for work. After that, no pubs or nightclubs for the rest of the year unless he signs in, and he can't stay out later than 10. Make it so that he's not to meet his mates either.
That should be enough punishment.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bob ledgers barber, bobbystagsfan, Martin Shaw, MTFC Man, Paulstag, stagshead, Walton Stag and 322 guests