Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
I'd heard a rumour that he was a giant reptile and could swallow a goat whole.
I just wondered if it was the same one.
Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
stag324 wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Rob, and you are the world expert in this.
Just because I don’t respond with this board says jump deserves abuse, well says a lot about what type of people you are.
He wasn’t supportive of our new training ground, fell out with half the board and thought our youth set up was a shambles.
Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
I'd heard a rumour that he was a giant reptile and could swallow a goat whole.
I just wondered if it was the same one.
stag324 wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Rob, and you are the world expert in this.
Just because I don’t respond with this board says jump deserves abuse, well says a lot about what type of people you are.
He wasn’t supportive of our new training ground, fell out with half the board and thought our youth set up was a shambles.
bigalstag wrote:Think he was right on all three. Not hard to work out who disagreed with him.
Amber Andy wrote:stag324 wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Rob, and you are the world expert in this.
Just because I don’t respond with this board says jump deserves abuse, well says a lot about what type of people you are.
He wasn’t supportive of our new training ground, fell out with half the board and thought our youth set up was a shambles.
He wasn't far off the mark then.
If that was the reason he was sacked, then the awful decision was even worse.
Rob wrote:stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
stag324 wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Rob, and you are the world expert in this.
Just because I don’t respond with this board says jump deserves abuse, well says a lot about what type of people you are.
He wasn’t supportive of our new training ground, fell out with half the board and thought our youth set up was a shambles.
stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
bellwhiff wrote:stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
a. No he was too chicken so joined the RAF
b. What does it explain, raspberry?
Rob wrote:bellwhiff wrote:stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
a. No he was too chicken so joined the RAF
b. What does it explain, raspberry?
I was very much waiting for that, disappointingly not as insulting as you can be
Amber Andy wrote:stag324 wrote:Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:What rumour is that then?
Anyone ending a sentence with end of is almost always talking out of their orifice, which is clearly the case here. Do you really think it would take until now to be mentioned?
Rob, and you are the world expert in this.
Just because I don’t respond with this board says jump deserves abuse, well says a lot about what type of people you are.
He wasn’t supportive of our new training ground, fell out with half the board and thought our youth set up was a shambles.
He wasn't far off the mark then.
If that was the reason he was sacked, then the awful decision was even worse.
Sedgwick wrote:Coughlan plus JR brings a very good chance of success...
First job is trying to get us over the finish line this season with this pile of crap.
stag324 wrote:P.S. Rob you used be in the army, am I right? Explains a lot if so
Jamie wrote:JR has to shoulder some of the blame. After last years awful finish appointing a rookie was a risk and its massively back fired. He might have been a good man but was a terrible appointment at the wrong time.
The rest of what he said is spot on. The players have let everyone down.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bucksstag, Cardiffstag23, Martin Shaw, Nutty Stag, patstag, Stags Head Stags and 314 guests