Spiritater wrote:JD sounded utterly lost to me. I think he's at his wits end as what to do next. No matter what he does it doesn't work. As I've said Klopp would struggle to get a tune out of this lot. As a team they stink of relegation .
part time pete wrote:Everyone needs to remember that these players are a year older.
Legs have gone on a number of them.
wink68 wrote:part time pete wrote:Everyone needs to remember that these players are a year older.
Legs have gone on a number of them.
Sorry, what a lame excuse. Maybe Bishop with his age, but 27 or 28 should make no difference. Sick of saying it. ITS THE MANAGER.
part time pete wrote:Everyone needs to remember that these players are a year older.
Legs have gone on a number of them.
Foresttownstag wrote:wink68 wrote:part time pete wrote:Everyone needs to remember that these players are a year older.
Legs have gone on a number of them.
Sorry, what a lame excuse. Maybe Bishop with his age, but 27 or 28 should make no difference. Sick of saying it. ITS THE MANAGER.
27,28 years of age, they should be in their prime.
The whole legs have gone is absolute rubbish, Bishop yes, rest of them absolutely not.
If the legs have gone then Drewe wouldn’t be spouting off every single week about how much running they all did in 90 minutes.
Jamie wrote:To be fair yesterday at half time they were doing some organised training stuff in a square with tackling / short passing etc.
cassellswasmagic wrote:It’s a fact that 29 is the prime footballing age. All the top footballers performed their best around this age. Our players, Bishop aside are not over the hill. I’m sick of these excuses. Lots of players play well older than that.
MTFCMusings wrote:cassellswasmagic wrote:It’s a fact that 29 is the prime footballing age. All the top footballers performed their best around this age. Our players, Bishop aside are not over the hill. I’m sick of these excuses. Lots of players play well older than that.
It differs by position I would say.
Keepers tend to be in their prime years later than outfield players.
Defenders and midfielders around 27-28 as you say.
Strikers a bit younger, 24-26 I would say.
cassellswasmagic wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:cassellswasmagic wrote:It’s a fact that 29 is the prime footballing age. All the top footballers performed their best around this age. Our players, Bishop aside are not over the hill. I’m sick of these excuses. Lots of players play well older than that.
It differs by position I would say.
Keepers tend to be in their prime years later than outfield players.
Defenders and midfielders around 27-28 as you say.
Strikers a bit younger, 24-26 I would say.
World Cup stats actually say 27.5 is the prime age of a footballer. What’s our average age.
Question: Why do Exeter keep producing youngsters that attract lots of money in transfers (they’ve got another one) and Stags don’t?
cassellswasmagic wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:cassellswasmagic wrote:It’s a fact that 29 is the prime footballing age. All the top footballers performed their best around this age. Our players, Bishop aside are not over the hill. I’m sick of these excuses. Lots of players play well older than that.
It differs by position I would say.
Keepers tend to be in their prime years later than outfield players.
Defenders and midfielders around 27-28 as you say.
Strikers a bit younger, 24-26 I would say.
World Cup stats actually say 27.5 is the prime age of a footballer. What’s our average age.
Question: Why do Exeter keep producing youngsters that attract lots of money in transfers (they’ve got another one) and Stags don’t?
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], mans_field, Martin Shaw, stewartstag and 305 guests