Richard Cranium wrote:Chander Lear wrote:As lord sugar, in business you sometimes have to take a gamble.
Remember first time I watched the Apprentice aswell
JD, you're fired.
Richard Cranium wrote:Chander Lear wrote:As lord sugar, in business you sometimes have to take a gamble.
Remember first time I watched the Apprentice aswell
arsene wengers coat wrote:He has good intentions for the club, that's it. That's all anyone ever says, 'he loves the club'. Is that the only pre-requisite for being a businessman, ambassador and key decision maker at the club? Does he 'bleed amber and blue'? Oh that's fine then... But that doesn't mean he knows what's best for the club, as the DF/JD decision is showing.
Spiritater wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:The abuse the board is getting in particular steve is not cool. If these people leave, who love the club and put in their own cash, then JR will need to find new board members who are willing to put cash in to fill the void. I cannot imagine there being too many people out there willing to do what they do.
Steve and the board may have all agreed that JD was the man for the job. I can see why they did it. Obviously its not working as it stands and they have some key decisions to make or break us. JD may even succeed which if kept, is another key decision, who knows?
But please cut them some slack in terms of abuse. Many feel dempster isnt good enough now and want him out, that if fair but dont take it to the next level and alienate the people who are funding the club and its infrastructure.
When those people patronise and condescend to us trying to whitewash what many of us said was an awful decision and has turned out that way then we have the right of reply
Maybe its shaping up to be a bad decision, had it have turned out to be a masterplan then we wouldn't be complaining. In all walks of life potentially bad decisions are made - the point i'm making, how is trying to hound someone outgoing to solve anything?
Most aren't trying to hound Mr Hymas out they are simply replying to his point of view and seemingly vested interest involvement in what has been a defining decision. We simply want the club to acknowledge that this awful appointment hasn't worked, swallow their pride and get in an experienced manager we can get behind and support wholeheartedly...not simply decry the overwhelming evidence that his has been a failure and is splitting the club.
Supposing Jones or Tisdale came in and was unable to get a better tune out of this bunch of bottleless wonders, how long would your wholehearted support last Chris... 3-4 games maybe?
Amber Andy wrote:Big yella wrote:And the problem with getting in an experienced manager is that Mr. Humans, still thinks he knows better and can tell him who to pick.
Is that fact or fake news ? That is a honest question as I don't know.
Could it be a recommendation based on the " failure " of not achieving promotion with two experienced managers ? If it was, then I would suggest the recommendation was given in good faith. As I understand it, the board with the exception of Carolyn agreed. I'm sure it was discussed at length and wasn't made on the whim of one person.
What I would like to see, when the time comes for the board to appoint a new manager, is a shortlist and from that shortlist they interview the top three. Their preferred method seems to be to just have one target, rather than advertise.
Big yella wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Big yella wrote:And the problem with getting in an experienced manager is that Mr. Humans, still thinks he knows better and can tell him who to pick.
Is that fact or fake news ? That is a honest question as I don't know.
Could it be a recommendation based on the " failure " of not achieving promotion with two experienced managers ? If it was, then I would suggest the recommendation was given in good faith. As I understand it, the board with the exception of Carolyn agreed. I'm sure it was discussed at length and wasn't made on the whim of one person.
What I would like to see, when the time comes for the board to appoint a new manager, is a shortlist and from that shortlist they interview the top three. Their preferred method seems to be to just have one target, rather than advertise.
He came out and publicly slated DF for not playing youth teamers last season.
I agree with you about drawing up a shortlist and interviewing the preferred candidates. That's how we found Paul Cox, and we got the right man for the job at hand.
gazza1988 wrote:Big yella wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Big yella wrote:And the problem with getting in an experienced manager is that Mr. Humans, still thinks he knows better and can tell him who to pick.
Is that fact or fake news ? That is a honest question as I don't know.
Could it be a recommendation based on the " failure " of not achieving promotion with two experienced managers ? If it was, then I would suggest the recommendation was given in good faith. As I understand it, the board with the exception of Carolyn agreed. I'm sure it was discussed at length and wasn't made on the whim of one person.
What I would like to see, when the time comes for the board to appoint a new manager, is a shortlist and from that shortlist they interview the top three. Their preferred method seems to be to just have one target, rather than advertise.
He came out and publicly slated DF for not playing youth teamers last season.
I agree with you about drawing up a shortlist and interviewing the preferred candidates. That's how we found Paul Cox, and we got the right man for the job at hand.
https://www.stagsnet.net/phpBB3/viewtop ... 44#p761344
gazza1988 wrote:Big yella wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Big yella wrote:And the problem with getting in an experienced manager is that Mr. Humans, still thinks he knows better and can tell him who to pick.
Is that fact or fake news ? That is a honest question as I don't know.
Could it be a recommendation based on the " failure " of not achieving promotion with two experienced managers ? If it was, then I would suggest the recommendation was given in good faith. As I understand it, the board with the exception of Carolyn agreed. I'm sure it was discussed at length and wasn't made on the whim of one person.
What I would like to see, when the time comes for the board to appoint a new manager, is a shortlist and from that shortlist they interview the top three. Their preferred method seems to be to just have one target, rather than advertise.
He came out and publicly slated DF for not playing youth teamers last season.
I agree with you about drawing up a shortlist and interviewing the preferred candidates. That's how we found Paul Cox, and we got the right man for the job at hand.
viewtopic.php?p=761344#p761344
georgefostersbeard wrote:One week on, the manager shows he is so scared of losing that he will not start with one of three flair players.
He now appears almost paralysed by the fear of losing games or his job that he is becoming so conservative in his line up choices that it will cost him his job.
Chrisuknottm wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:One week on, the manager shows he is so scared of losing that he will not start with one of three flair players.
He now appears almost paralysed by the fear of losing games or his job that he is becoming so conservative in his line up choices that it will cost him his job.
Exactly what I said at the game. He is defensive through and through. He was like a shop dummy at breaks in play. He was generally the furthest one away from the players. Thought the manager was supposed to motivate???
georgefostersbeard wrote:One week on, the manager shows he is so scared of losing that he will not start with one of three flair players.
He now appears almost paralysed by the fear of losing games or his job that he is becoming so conservative in his line up choices that it will cost him his job.
yellowstagsfan wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:One week on, the manager shows he is so scared of losing that he will not start with one of three flair players.
He now appears almost paralysed by the fear of losing games or his job that he is becoming so conservative in his line up choices that it will cost him his job.
The only thing he got right was the substitutions for once but I think the West Stand made those decisions for him!
Chrisuknottm wrote:yellowstagsfan wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:One week on, the manager shows he is so scared of losing that he will not start with one of three flair players.
He now appears almost paralysed by the fear of losing games or his job that he is becoming so conservative in his line up choices that it will cost him his job.
The only thing he got right was the substitutions for once but I think the West Stand made those decisions for him!
But what took him so long. He's clueless. .... but at least JR was there to see it and feel the lack of atmosphere and the toxic feeling from the fans
adamstag wrote:He’s literally is Adam Murray mark 2.
He is sacking himself through his unimaginative, negative, uninspiring football at home.
Piss off your punters at home - which he is doing with aplomb - and you’ve lost.
adamstag wrote:He’s literally is Adam Murray mark 2.
He is sacking himself through his unimaginative, negative, uninspiring football at home.
Piss off your punters at home - which he is doing with aplomb - and you’ve lost.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, berryhillstag, bobbystagsfan, groundhoppingstag, healthclub, MTFCMusings, Nutty Stag, Showaddywaddy, Stephen and 452 guests