hucknallstag wrote:Parkinsons style would bore/frustrate and divide support.has to be better options than that.
He's a winner. Hoofball is fine if you win.
hucknallstag wrote:Parkinsons style would bore/frustrate and divide support.has to be better options than that.
ParisStag wrote:Exactly Musings. Parkinson is the one. Otherwise, Appleton.
People are too easily wooed by a big name. He got the Fulham job because he had been their captain and did a good job there, where he was loved. Sometimes managers get a good break and a club that fits. He also did fairly well for Wales, where he'd also been a player. Elsewhere though, where he has no connections to fans or club, he failed.
Random Hero wrote:ParisStag wrote:Exactly Musings. Parkinson is the one. Otherwise, Appleton.
People are too easily wooed by a big name. He got the Fulham job because he had been their captain and did a good job there, where he was loved. Sometimes managers get a good break and a club that fits. He also did fairly well for Wales, where he'd also been a player. Elsewhere though, where he has no connections to fans or club, he failed.
I’m not saying Coleman would be better than Parkinson or Appleton. Earlier in this thread you both said you’d ‘Rather have Dempster than Coleman’. That is the point I take issue with.
nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
Random Hero wrote:nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
I see you’ve edited your post MTFCMusings, but ok. If it wasn’t you, then I apologise. The rest of your argument is still horse dung, though.
Random Hero wrote:ParisStag wrote:Exactly Musings. Parkinson is the one. Otherwise, Appleton.
People are too easily wooed by a big name. He got the Fulham job because he had been their captain and did a good job there, where he was loved. Sometimes managers get a good break and a club that fits. He also did fairly well for Wales, where he'd also been a player. Elsewhere though, where he has no connections to fans or club, he failed.
I’m not saying Coleman would be better than Parkinson or Appleton. Earlier in this thread you both said you’d ‘Rather have Dempster than Coleman’. That is the point I take issue with.
nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
Random Hero wrote:nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
How can you not take that literally?! you said it and it’s there in black and white!
ParisStag wrote:Random Hero wrote:nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
How can you not take that literally?! you said it and it’s there in black and white!
I guess I assumed you, knowing my Facebook posts, would be familiar with my tone, even though it's in black and white. Anyway, forget it, it's hardly important.
Random Hero wrote:ParisStag wrote:Random Hero wrote:nick_stags wrote:ParisStag wrote:I'd rather keep Dempster than have him.
So would I.
How can you not take that literally?! you said it and it’s there in black and white!
I guess I assumed you, knowing my Facebook posts, would be familiar with my tone, even though it's in black and white. Anyway, forget it, it's hardly important.
Didn’t realise I had you on Facebook - no idea who most people’s usernames are on here!
I know Vicar Jeremiah well though - might head to one of his sermons on Sunday to pray for us.
MTFCMusings wrote:
Here we go...
Dp1976 wrote:three key areas addressed - Fitness is shocking, performances are woeful and the goalkeeping (Bobby excluded) is poor, good start JR, please continue
MTFCMusings wrote:'The club believes that a fresh impetus is required within these areas of the football department.'
Interesting.
In the space of 5 months, Pledger and Ashby have been sacked, re-hired, and sacked again. Strange.
Chander Lear wrote:.
Sedgwick wrote:The Fitness coach... they're knackered after 60 minutes. Also noticed they do static stretches when warming up with him... the number one cause of injuries to footballers because the muscle just tightens up straight away.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: adamr999, arsene wengers coat, Drezden1, Elkesley Stag, gazza1988, hucknall stag, Paulstag, Sandy Pate Best Stag, skeglad, Sneag, Son Of Sherwood, ST4GS, Tomwh, yorkshire stag and 468 guests