Stoney wrote:Sounds good that the lads are just 'messing about' in training.
fox in the box wrote:Wow - that's a very worrying insight into the way things are being conducted behind the scenes.
I do worry about the authority of those in charge.
arsene wengers coat wrote:These two are Steady Eddies. They are operational, not leaders. When you leave operational people in charge, it falls apart as they struggle to make decisions or instruct delegates properly. JD and Golver come across as operational. They're probably good at being told what to do and do it well, but I don't believe they, as a pair, can succeed without direction from above.
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Imagination often varies wildly from the truth. It is the sister of suspicion and the parent of mistrust.
Some fans have very active imaginations.
bobbystagsfan wrote:People on here didn't like Cox's interviews because of his 'good honest boys' and 'errrmmm'. People didn't like Evans interviews moaning about ref decisions, people didn't like flitcrofts interviews using the galvanised and people don't like Dempster/Glover interviews because they 'lack motivation'
I honestly dont think some will ever like any press conferences from any managers, just don't watch them?
bobbystagsfan wrote:People on here didn't like Cox's interviews because of his 'good honest boys' and 'errrmmm'. People didn't like Evans interviews moaning about ref decisions, people didn't like flitcrofts interviews using the galvanised and people don't like Dempster/Glover interviews because they 'lack motivation'
I honestly dont think some will ever like any press conferences from any managers, just don't watch them?
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Imagination often varies wildly from the truth. It is the sister of suspicion and the parent of mistrust.
Some fans have very active imaginations.
WVStag wrote:Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:Imagination often varies wildly from the truth. It is the sister of suspicion and the parent of mistrust.
Some fans have very active imaginations.
Yeah... it's clear as day that they're boring as toast mate.
EdwinstoweStag wrote:fox in the box wrote:Wow - that's a very worrying insight into the way things are being conducted behind the scenes.
I do worry about the authority of those in charge.
I’m tempted to concur, FITB
georgefostersbeard wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:fox in the box wrote:Wow - that's a very worrying insight into the way things are being conducted behind the scenes.
I do worry about the authority of those in charge.
I’m tempted to concur, FITB
Well that has undermined any validity you had then Foxy!!!!
He made a simple comment that the players had informal penalty sessions during some training sessions. He didn't say they were messing about in training, he said that they actually were practising penalties more often than the management team were directing them.
It is almost as though people are trying to find the slightest chink in an interview so they can have a go at the management. And then they wonder why we end up with anodine interviews where nothing is said and nothing is risked for fear of some forum expert to dissect it and find fault
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Warsop Stag and 282 guests