baz wrote:Would love one like Chesterfield not built on the cheap .
baz wrote:Would love one like Chesterfield not built on the cheap .
ParisStag wrote:Paul Broughton told me he advocates the stand first model over the hotel and also said that he wouldn't want a hotel in the corner so that later, they could fill the corners and connect the Quarry Lane and North Stands to the IGS.
baz wrote:Would love one like Chesterfield not built on the cheap .
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Let's fill our ground first on a regular basis before talking about developing the ground.
Sneag wrote:Sneer all you like. The prozac is a better design that Field Mill, both inside & out.
Conker wrote:Under Radford the ground has improved loads, it does need that 4th stand though.
Spiritater wrote:Conker wrote:Under Radford the ground has improved loads, it does need that 4th stand though.
Not yet it doesn't. Come the start of next season we'll probably be getting 4-4.5k at the games which means it'll be nowhere near full. Money needs to be diverted to the playing budget to get us up/challenging next season or crowds will fall away. No good having that nice empty stand on the Bish overlooking a team kicking around playing in mid table or worse.
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:The same applies to the IGU Upper North Side Will.
Hasloan clearly made some major cutbacks on toilets.
You just need a long wall with half a drainpipe flowing out onto the terraces
Spiritater wrote:Maybe an improvement to existing facilities yes Conker, but a new Bish which inevitably will divert an awful lot of money away from the playing side?
We are talking millions of pounds here, and it's not needed yet.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Leigh5t, Martin Shaw, Nutty Stag, Stoney, yorkstag and 332 guests