EdwinstoweStag wrote:Frontrowhero wrote:Sedgwick wrote:steve-hymas wrote:I’ve spoken to a couple of the lads up at the RH academy and they know nothing about it .
With the lads frozen out by the manager it’s very difficult for the lads confidence .i spoke to Zayn and he has had an ankle problem for a little while but says he is fine now .We have a striker shortage and to me he ticks all the boxes .Big strong and fast.If he were languishing in the reserves at a championship club he would stand a chance .But hey ho is one of ours so not deemed good enough.
For someone with such an important role in a professional club, I don't find it right you post on a fans message board spouting such tripe. It's not at all professional and can't imagine a director at any other club doing so. I know how passionate you are but leave it off here and focus on the club.
As for being frozen out... They're kids. Are you suggesting the manager risks promotion for the sake of giving minutes to kids over players the chairman has invested heavily in??!
And for being good enough, that's the managers decision and I back him. I've been around the set up at Derby and it's streets ahead of ours and the recruitment is top notch. I'll use Timi as an example, he's played in premier League 2 quite comfortably and got Derby in and around the top 3 of a very good league with the likes of Chelsea, city and united. Can you honestly say any of our kids are even close to his quality? Timi at present is only good enough for League two, so where does that leave our kids standard at?
I've seen most of our youth lads and they look and play like boys, not men. The manager is clearly trying to bring the youth through, gibbens, Smith, Graham, law and all the others he played in the cup game. Just because he's not picking the few players you think will do well DOES NOT mean they are being frozen out, in fact that's such a ludicrous statement and nasty dig at a manager who's doing really well.
If you're bitter the training ground isn't up to scratch yet and those professional footballers would rather play on actuall grass than wow who ever is responsible for the players having to train on 4G needs sacking. When I was at Derby the first team was strictly banned from going near it and could only do incredibly light work on the indoor like stretching and jogging/ bit of passing when the weather was bad. We used to play staff matches after work at moor farm and was always told, "an ambulance will takes 25 minutes".
As no hunger in paradise proves, most youth setups are failing kids and it's not the managers fault.
The arrogance of people in and around some of these cat1 academies is shocking, hence your reaction Sedgwick. Pride, passion and commitment count as much as talent. I would sooner see a law over Elsnik and hakeem over sterling James, they grow up with a desire to play for MTFC and you know you will get 100%. Have to say some of these mercenaries and young lads you see like Anderson, elsnik don’t give a damn about our club and as a result you don’t get the same commitment, passion as a youth teamer of your own. Also it’s the way a club like ours will make money in the future, we need to develop the talent we have. We ain’t going to make no money out of elsnik and Anderson
I can see both sides of this debate.
However, what IS the point in investing in a youth development structure that isn’t likely to bring talent to the first team?
It seems to me that, if the management see no value in development, then why all the involvement with Brooksby and, recently, the money invested by JR and SH in creating the RH facility?
I think we ALL want to see kids coming through, but they HAVE to be good enough. I guess we just have to trust DF and his team to make the judgement calls.
Dan wrote:How will we know they're good enough for the first team if they don't get a chance? Reserve games are nowhere near the same as a first team fixture (most aren't even played on the same surface!). There's a young lad at Notts who has scored in 8 consecutive reserve games & is the best player on the pitch in most games but can't get in the 16 of a team 92nd in the league, it's madness.
Dan wrote:How will we know they're good enough for the first team if they don't get a chance? Reserve games are nowhere near the same as a first team fixture (most aren't even played on the same surface!). There's a young lad at Notts who has scored in 8 consecutive reserve games & is the best player on the pitch in most games but can't get in the 16 of a team 92nd in the league, it's madness.
gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:How will we know they're good enough for the first team if they don't get a chance? Reserve games are nowhere near the same as a first team fixture (most aren't even played on the same surface!). There's a young lad at Notts who has scored in 8 consecutive reserve games & is the best player on the pitch in most games but can't get in the 16 of a team 92nd in the league, it's madness.
Like you say, a reserve fixture isn't the same as a league fixture. Why would a kid get in ahead of a seasoned Pro, probably on 5-10x the wage. Jordan Graham would probably get a start on Saturday alongside Ajose, but he's injured. We may very well go with a youth striker on the bench.
Imagine if DF started a youth teamers and he was like a fish out of water and we drop out of the autos, there'd be hell to pay.
jpstags wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Steve's opinion shouldn't be on here when it's a clear dig at the manager and could provoke disharmony whilst we're pushing for promotion. His opinion is that Zayn Hakeem should be playing in the first team because he's 'big, strong and fast'. So is Matt Preston, lets stick him up front. It's also in direct contradiction to the opinion of the youth players, according to other posters on here. Are you telling me than young lads are openly dissenting to not getting in the first team of the third best team in the league, especially a striker when we have one of the leagues top scorers, and another big name striker on the bench?
So let's just get this right, you are telling us what Steve Hymas opinion is ???
Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:How will we know they're good enough for the first team if they don't get a chance? Reserve games are nowhere near the same as a first team fixture (most aren't even played on the same surface!). There's a young lad at Notts who has scored in 8 consecutive reserve games & is the best player on the pitch in most games but can't get in the 16 of a team 92nd in the league, it's madness.
Like you say, a reserve fixture isn't the same as a league fixture. Why would a kid get in ahead of a seasoned Pro, probably on 5-10x the wage. Jordan Graham would probably get a start on Saturday alongside Ajose, but he's injured. We may very well go with a youth striker on the bench.
Imagine if DF started a youth teamers and he was like a fish out of water and we drop out of the autos, there'd be hell to pay.
Because he might just be good enough? But how will we know if we don't try it?
Dan wrote:We drop points anyway so your point is invalid.
Chander Lear wrote:Dan wrote:We drop points anyway so your point is invalid.
Where does the buck stop if DF fields a youth teamer, we lose and he is then called out for not fielding his strongest team?
every team drops points, but not whilst purposely fielding unknowns at crucial stages of the season when we have season pros available.
Then tell me my point is invalid.
Dan wrote:And of course I'll leave you with a famous quote from Alan Hansen which bit him on the arse: "You don't win anything with kids!".
Dan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Dan wrote:How will we know they're good enough for the first team if they don't get a chance? Reserve games are nowhere near the same as a first team fixture (most aren't even played on the same surface!). There's a young lad at Notts who has scored in 8 consecutive reserve games & is the best player on the pitch in most games but can't get in the 16 of a team 92nd in the league, it's madness.
Like you say, a reserve fixture isn't the same as a league fixture. Why would a kid get in ahead of a seasoned Pro, probably on 5-10x the wage. Jordan Graham would probably get a start on Saturday alongside Ajose, but he's injured. We may very well go with a youth striker on the bench.
Imagine if DF started a youth teamers and he was like a fish out of water and we drop out of the autos, there'd be hell to pay.
Because he might just be good enough? But how will we know if we don't try it?
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Dan wrote:And of course I'll leave you with a famous quote from Alan Hansen which bit him on the arse: "You don't win anything with kids!".
....... and those kids were Ryan Giggs, David Beckham, Gary Neville, Nicky Butt, Paul Scholes and Phil Neville.
I think that was the exception which proves the rule!!
cassellswasmagic wrote:Putting a youngster on the bench as back up for two games is one thing, but I dare say every one of them would struggle if put on the pitch. DF can’t risk it.
steve-hymas wrote:I find it a little worrying that many wouldn’t back one of our youth/under 21 strikers being given a chance given our mini striker crisis .If they don’t get a chance in this situation it’s never going to happen.
Any striker out of contract will not be match fit and our lads are chomping at the bit .
Fergie took that decision on youth and the rest is history.They weren’t household names at the time.
Craig disley ,Liam Lawrence etc anyone ??
steve-hymas wrote:I find it a little worrying that many wouldn’t back one of our youth/under 21 strikers being given a chance given our mini striker crisis .If they don’t get a chance in this situation it’s never going to happen.
Any striker out of contract will not be match fit and our lads are chomping at the bit .
Fergie took that decision on youth and the rest is history.They weren’t household names at the time.
Craig disley ,Liam Lawrence etc anyone ??
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 254 guests