Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
steiner wrote:Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
abc wrote:Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
Look at it from Angol's point of view once Walker came in it put him down to fourth in the pecking order and obviously Flipflop was gonna play Walker regular, therefore when the chance to play a division higher came .....
Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
Norman wrote:Can see why Swindon fans were as happy as Larry we took him off there hands!
Amber Andy wrote:abc wrote:Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
Look at it from Angol's point of view once Walker came in it put him down to fourth in the pecking order and obviously Flipflop was gonna play Walker regular, therefore when the chance to play a division higher came .....
Angol didn't request a transfer. We had to off load a striker. Either Angol or Rose.
If you don't think it's the budget, ask yourself what quality of striker we could bring in if DF could use two of the wages of either Anderson, Diamond or Angol.
You are assuming Angol would be fourth choice. Fact is when Rose went off we had no effective striker to bring on, or had you forgotten Davies is injured. Angol would be involved if he was here. If we had a striker who could finish 33% of the chances being created we would be at the top end of the table.
abc wrote:Amber Andy wrote:abc wrote:Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
Look at it from Angol's point of view once Walker came in it put him down to fourth in the pecking order and obviously Flipflop was gonna play Walker regular, therefore when the chance to play a division higher came .....
Angol didn't request a transfer. We had to off load a striker. Either Angol or Rose.
If you don't think it's the budget, ask yourself what quality of striker we could bring in if DF could use two of the wages of either Anderson, Diamond or Angol.
You are assuming Angol would be fourth choice. Fact is when Rose went off we had no effective striker to bring on, or had you forgotten Davies is injured. Angol would be involved if he was here. If we had a striker who could finish 33% of the chances being created we would be at the top end of the table.
Sorry I wasn't aware that Angol could read into the future.
steiner wrote:Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
Jamie wrote:steiner wrote:Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
He's a cruel and idiotic person... If the cap fits.
bellwhiff wrote:Jamie wrote:steiner wrote:Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
He's a cruel and idiotic person... If the cap fits.
Jamie. I repeat. I’d like to meet you next time I attend a game. Let’s see if you’ve got the stones to say that to my face
bellwhiff wrote:steiner wrote:Dan wrote:Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
He defends the McCann's so I wouldn't take much notice of him
what a cruel idiotic comment.
Expect no less from the unhinged loser. He truly is a card carried weirdo
Sneag wrote:You really let your self down throwing out school boy threats Belly. Stick to the insults, they are at least funny(ish).
Besides by the time you attend another home game what are you going to do? Have a zimmer frame duel?
Amber Andy wrote:abc wrote:Jamie wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:if we'd have managed to shift the crocks in diamond and Mirfin, and got rid of Anderson I don't think we would've needed to sell angol. but we couldn't shift them, so the target switched to either rose or angol to balance the books.
I think we would have a much better team if we could've got rid of diamond, mirfin and Anderson and replaced them with players who aren't injured for over half a season
No way would JR have made him sell Angol, leaving us with only 3 proper strikers... because we have 2 injured and one unwanted player.
Our budget has always been competitive under JR. Sometimes far above competitive.
Are some people really that desperate to defend 'statistically' one of our worst ever managers, that they'll try and put the heat on JR instead. What a joke.
What your suggesting is JR hampered our season and left his manager short, despite spending millions, all to save 50k or so...
Even if JR did make him stick to a budget, it's still DFs fault for blowing too much in the wrong areas and leaving us short up front.
Look at it from Angol's point of view once Walker came in it put him down to fourth in the pecking order and obviously Flipflop was gonna play Walker regular, therefore when the chance to play a division higher came .....
Angol didn't request a transfer. We had to off load a striker. Either Angol or Rose.
If you don't think it's the budget, ask yourself what quality of striker we could bring in if DF could use two of the wages of either Anderson, Diamond or Angol.
You are assuming Angol would be fourth choice. Fact is when Rose went off we had no effective striker to bring on, or had you forgotten Davies is injured. Angol would be involved if he was here. If we had a striker who could finish 33% of the chances being created we would be at the top end of the table.
bellwhiff wrote:Sneag wrote:You really let your self down throwing out school boy threats Belly. Stick to the insults, they are at least funny(ish).
Besides by the time you attend another home game what are you going to do? Have a zimmer frame duel?
There is no threat. It was all aimed at the bellthronk, not me. Are you losing it ?
Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sneag wrote:You really let your self down throwing out school boy threats Belly. Stick to the insults, they are at least funny(ish).
Besides by the time you attend another home game what are you going to do? Have a zimmer frame duel?
There is no threat. It was all aimed at the bellthronk, not me. Are you losing it ?
You are very clearly making a threat towards Jamie. Are you that deranged you can't remember what you said? It's still written down, just scroll up.
bellwhiff wrote:Sneag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Sneag wrote:You really let your self down throwing out school boy threats Belly. Stick to the insults, they are at least funny(ish).
Besides by the time you attend another home game what are you going to do? Have a zimmer frame duel?
There is no threat. It was all aimed at the bellthronk, not me. Are you losing it ?
You are very clearly making a threat towards Jamie. Are you that deranged you can't remember what you said? It's still written down, just scroll up.
Read it again then. You’re wrong.
Jamie wrote:Really though we know it is clearly a threat, as in, you wouldn't dare say that because id 'beat you up' or whatever.
Jamie wrote: I don't hide behind fake names and online BS..
BigGuy wrote:Jamie wrote: I don't hide behind fake names and online BS..
As opposed to when you went under the name 'North Notts Stag' ?
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Martin Shaw, Stags Head Stags, Tre Cool and 317 guests