PRL13 wrote:I`m hoping this site will be full of sensible debate. I`ve left the other one as there are too many morons on there to make being on there worthwhile.
Sneag wrote:PRL13 wrote:I`m hoping this site will be full of sensible debate. I`ve left the other one as there are too many morons on there to make being on there worthwhile.
We have a smattering of morons on this site too.
yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
Chimney wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
But neither of you were at the game?
PRL13 wrote:At least the morons on here won`t be young (or middle aged) lol, and won`t start threatening you that they will come to the places that you frequent! Not that I`m bothered, but don`t need the hassle and come on here for fun and information.
Sandy Pate Best Stag wrote:I know that Darren watches a lot of football and I respect his opinion which is normally balanced and fair.
Chimney wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
But neither of you were at the game?
yorkshire stag wrote:Chimney wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
But neither of you were at the game?
what’s being at the game, got to do with an opinion of how strong the bench is?
EdwinstoweStag wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Chimney wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
But neither of you were at the game?
what’s being at the game, got to do with an opinion of how strong the bench is?
You don’t see many benches nowadays. Mostly a series of plastic seats bolted together
yorkshire stag wrote:Agreeing with me about a poor attacking bench Darren, get ya tin hat ready youth how dare you have an opinion
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:I've just watched the game on iFollow. I thought it was a mediocre to average performance by the Stags. Yeovil will not be finishing in the top half of the table so it was an opportunity missed to not grab three points. The goals we conceded were very sloppy. The first Yeovil goal was just a long punt forward which should have been headed away by Matt Preston. He missed the header and then Krystian Pearce did not pick up Jaiyesimi. The second Yeovil goal was from a long throw and I think Otis Khan should have blocked Omar Sowunmi's shot. Otis Khan is good on the ball but he does not like a tackle. My Man of the Match was Craig Davies who lead the line well and who was a threat in both halfs. I also thought Alex MacDonald played well. He kept things very simple and did not give the ball away very much. It was his pressing and block that resulted in Craig Davies' goal. It was also good to see us scoring from a set play for the second consecutive match (Matt Preston's header from a quick free kick against Yeovil and Tyler Walker's goal from a corner against Newport). I was disappointed by how many long balls we played at times. Both sides were guilty of giving the ball away too easily. I did not think Hayden White, CJ Hamilton, Neal Bishop and Tyler Walker had much of an impact on the game. It would have been great to have seen Danny Rose coming on as a sub for Tyler Walker. CJ Hamilton defended OK as a right wing back but he offered little as an attacking threat. We need to get him further up the pitch and I would like to see him back on the left hand side.
Overall you cannot complain about 4 points from 6. However the lack of forwards on the bench is a little worrying. We could struggle if Craig Davies and Tyler Walker pick up injuries or lose form.
bellwhiff wrote:The issue wasn’t the point about the perceived weakness of the bench, it was the bone comment about taking off a striker for a midfielder in the last ten mins.
Of course the bench was short of attacking players on Saturday. We all know that.yorkshire stag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:The issue wasn’t the point about the perceived weakness of the bench, it was the bone comment about taking off a striker for a midfielder in the last ten mins.
As normal wrong again, it was about how weak the bench was from an attacking perspective
Good God some people on here are such hard work!
yorkshire stag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:The issue wasn’t the point about the perceived weakness of the bench, it was the bone comment about taking off a striker for a midfielder in the last ten mins.
As normal wrong again, it was about how weak the bench was from an attacking perspective
Good God some people on here are such hard work!
bellwhiff wrote:yorkshire stag wrote:bellwhiff wrote:The issue wasn’t the point about the perceived weakness of the bench, it was the bone comment about taking off a striker for a midfielder in the last ten mins.
As normal wrong again, it was about how weak the bench was from an attacking perspective
Good God some people on here are such hard work!
No. Once again it was about you whining about removing a striker for a midfielder. Want me to find it again?
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 198 guests