Sneag wrote:Anything less than 13 will bea failure.
MTFC Man wrote:We often find tiredness is a problem due to our style of play being high intensity. I imagine our record on Tuesdays after playing Saturday isn't the greatest and I think the Tranmere game was a good example of that. If the games were all a week apart I would back us to get 8 points minimum, however we've got 4 games in 10 days and so think it will be much harder. If we use the squad sufficiently we should still be able to get the 8 points but it won't be as simple as some people are making out.
Amber Andy wrote:If we are to keep up with the top three, who are in good form at the moment, we need to be winning games. Easier said than done though.
scotsstag wrote:10 PTS from the next 4 games is definitely doable.
3 of the teams are in 18th, 19th and 24th in the league and we should be winning these if we have serious eyes on the autos.
"But", nobody is entitled to anything so hopefully it works out that way.
scotsstag wrote:10 PTS from the next 4 games is definitely doable.
3 of the teams are in 18th, 19th and 24th in the league and we should be winning these if we have serious eyes on the autos.
"But", nobody is entitled to anything so hopefully it works out that way.
robeyre wrote:scotsstag wrote:10 PTS from the next 4 games is definitely doable.
3 of the teams are in 18th, 19th and 24th in the league and we should be winning these if we have serious eyes on the autos.
"But", nobody is entitled to anything so hopefully it works out that way.
Good call there Scotsstag
Bet you weren't quite counting on the points coming how they have. But fair does you were the only one to call this before Christmas.
adamstag wrote:Sneag wrote:Anything less than 13 will bea failure.
good lord
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], smulls and 377 guests