Sneag wrote:How can you not tell the difference between Cargill & Bowery?
StagR wrote:No mention of 17 year old Abdullah ?? Looks like a player . . .
broomo wrote:Scrappy and disjointed but it's to be expected with 8 changes.
Abdullah looked useful and worked his nuts off.
Gale looks world beating one second but in the same move looks like a Sunday league player, again to be expected, he's raw but occasionally very, very explosive.
Swan has missed 3 golden chances but kept going.
I probably shouldn't care but I hate some of the comments about how poor we were, we could and possibly should have been 4 up before they got started and they only looked good when they brought on the likes of Close, Molyneux and others.
Their young kid Mosal(??) looked very good indeed.
A useful run out for the fringe players and 20-30 minutes to keep a few of the others ticking over.
Absolutely delighted to nick a game we could have lost.
16 unbeaten in all comps. I'll take that.
MTFCMusings wrote:A poor game of football quality wise, mistakes everywhere, neither team had much interest in defending which made it exciting to watch at least.
Good to get minutes into some players, Sean could have done with getting a goal to boost his clearly low confidence.
Don’t agree Broomo about us potentially being four nil up before they got started, they missed three good chances in the first ten minutes including one inside the first minute.
MTFCMusings wrote:A poor game of football quality wise, mistakes everywhere, neither team had much interest in defending which made it exciting to watch at least.
Good to get minutes into some players, Sean could have done with getting a goal to boost his clearly low confidence.
Don’t agree Broomo about us potentially being four nil up before they got started, they missed three good chances in the first ten minutes including one inside the first minute.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: BigGuy, bobbystagsfan, Dave Wayne, gazza1988, halifaxstag and 437 guests