Isle of Mansfield wrote:What gives you that feeling? Blind optimism? He's been hopeless this season. Can't even get on as a sub.
MTFCMusings wrote:This could be tougher than last nights game, Wimbledon rate very highly in terms of underlying numbers, and of course in the league table itself. Al Hamadi will be difficult to keep quiet.
James wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:This could be tougher than last nights game, Wimbledon rate very highly in terms of underlying numbers, and of course in the league table itself. Al Hamadi will be difficult to keep quiet.
They've had a very kind run of fixtures.
Captain Cunno wrote:Damn those pesky underlying numbers.
MTFCMusings wrote:James wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:This could be tougher than last nights game, Wimbledon rate very highly in terms of underlying numbers, and of course in the league table itself. Al Hamadi will be difficult to keep quiet.
They've had a very kind run of fixtures.
Yes, that’s a good point. They’ve not beaten s top half side yet, but have only lost one game to Stockport, drawing against Crewe and Wrexham.
Rob wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:James wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:This could be tougher than last nights game, Wimbledon rate very highly in terms of underlying numbers, and of course in the league table itself. Al Hamadi will be difficult to keep quiet.
They've had a very kind run of fixtures.
Yes, that’s a good point. They’ve not beaten s top half side yet, but have only lost one game to Stockport, drawing against Crewe and Wrexham.
Dare I say yet another reason why most stats are worthless I dare say if they'd had our run of games they'd not be second.
Martin Shaw wrote:
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: BH_Stag, Billy the fish, Bing [Bot], diablo, James, Jamie, Scothie the Stag, Sneag, St Hilary Stag and 396 guests