MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
Hjeldefan wrote:Well he hadn't run out of steam. He could have 1 leg and he would still look more likely to score than Sterling. It was a terrible substitution. As was bringing on Mellis who is a complete waste of a wage.
Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
What, even if he is having a poor game ?
MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
MTFCMusings wrote:Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
What, even if he is having a poor game ?
He wasn’t having a poor game though.
Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
What, even if he is having a poor game ?
He wasn’t having a poor game though.
Ok, but you have said he should NEVER be taken off (unless he is injured). So if he was having a stinker you'd leave him on ?
What kind of message would that give to the other players in the team?
Managers favourite maybe.
Oh the guy who got the hat trick the other day. But if he's playing gash, then he should be subbed. Could be a contract thing.Woodclanger 1 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
What, even if he is having a poor game ?
He wasn’t having a poor game though.
Ok, but you have said he should NEVER be taken off (unless he is injured). So if he was having a stinker you'd leave him on ?
What kind of message would that give to the other players in the team?
Managers favourite maybe.
No that's Walker, how he stays on instead of Anyone else is baffling!!!!
Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Amber Andy wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Otis should never be taken off unless he’s injured. He’s capable of the spectacular and the only player who actually goes looking for the ball.
What, even if he is having a poor game ?
He wasn’t having a poor game though.
Ok, but you have said he should NEVER be taken off (unless he is injured). So if he was having a stinker you'd leave him on ?
What kind of message would that give to the other players in the team?
Managers favourite maybe.
Amber Andy wrote:Wasn't at the game, so can't say how Otis played. Maybe he had a knock. Maybe he had run out of steam and his replacement (Stirling -James ) was seen as fresh legs.
If DF hadn't changed things people would be moaning he should have done.
The Mac manager made three changes which got them playing better.
Dammed if you do, dammed if you don't.
I'm disappointed we didn't get the three points, but it's early days yet.
Hjeldefan wrote:Because he is clueless.
Hjeldefan wrote:Well he hadn't run out of steam. He could have 1 leg and he would still look more likely to score than Sterling. It was a terrible substitution. As was bringing on Mellis who is a complete waste of a wage.
tillydog123 wrote:DF explain Khan sub thinking
Me thinks DF gone by Xmas at this rate
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 283 guests