Beano wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:Let’s just wait and see what transpires, shall we?
Fancy a pint down the Winchester?
If we don't they'll tear us to pieces, and that is really going to exacerbate things for all of us.
Beano wrote:EdwinstoweStag wrote:Let’s just wait and see what transpires, shall we?
Fancy a pint down the Winchester?
Foxy wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Foxy wrote:I can't say whether I believe or disbelieve Pearce.
What makes you believe he is telling the truth? Because he had an amber shirt on at the time or something else?
Because of his reaction.
And you don't think St Krystian of Pearce has ever heard that before, and nor as a 6ft centre half has ever said anything off-hand to an opponent?
Being honest my guess - and that's all it can be unless you are either KP or FF- is that Forresteri has called him the N word- but there's more to it than something mumbled in Spanish.
Big Yella when you join the words "you" and "are" together it's spelt "you're" not "your". As in "your opinion isn't worth jack".
Oh by the way you've declined to answer about the Twitter message 3 times now. I think it's clear to anyone reading this who's the avoider.
And it isn't me cupcake.
bellwhiff wrote:Foxy wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Foxy wrote:I can't say whether I believe or disbelieve Pearce.
What makes you believe he is telling the truth? Because he had an amber shirt on at the time or something else?
Because of his reaction.
And you don't think St Krystian of Pearce has ever heard that before, and nor as a 6ft centre half has ever said anything off-hand to an opponent?
Being honest my guess - and that's all it can be unless you are either KP or FF- is that Forresteri has called him the N word- but there's more to it than something mumbled in Spanish.
Big Yella when you join the words "you" and "are" together it's spelt "you're" not "your". As in "your opinion isn't worth jack".
Oh by the way you've declined to answer about the Twitter message 3 times now. I think it's clear to anyone reading this who's the avoider.
And it isn't me cupcake.
What twitter message ?
Foxy wrote:How youv concoctoted me saying that "Krystian Pearce has never said anything off-hand" to where where you end d up is great.
Also actually hilarious how you're saying you could say anything as evil, nasty, or vindictive to another player but you anyone mentions colour and you're triggered beyond belief going full on Diane Abbot.
But tgen she's a moron as well.
"No reason to question anything Pearce said". And whys that then Sedgewick?
Why are the FA bothering to investigate it at all then?
To think some of you are eligible for jury service.
Foxy wrote:bellwhiff wrote:Foxy wrote:I can't say whether I believe or disbelieve Pearce.
What makes you believe he is telling the truth? Because he had an amber shirt on at the time or something else?
Because of his reaction.
And you don't think St Krystian of Pearce has ever heard that before, and nor as a 6ft centre half has ever said anything off-hand to an opponent?
Being honest my guess - and that's all it can be unless you are either KP or FF- is that Forresteri has called him the N word- but there's more to it than something mumbled in Spanish.
Big Yella when you join the words "you" and "are" together it's spelt "you're" not "your". As in "your opinion isn't worth jack".
Oh by the way you've declined to answer about the Twitter message 3 times now. I think it's clear to anyone reading this who's the avoider.
And it isn't me cupcake.
bellwhiff wrote:Ref the tweet. Forestieri opened the violence door when he gubbed Butcher.
Want me to condemn the tweet for the threat ? Nope. I come from a violent culture. I’ve seen plenty of violence dished out that was deserved.
The definition of a "racist incident" will now include incidents categorised in policing terms both as crimes and non-crimes. It will now encompass "any incident which is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person". A new Code of Practice will record all such crimes.
Foxy wrote:Another thing is Pearce said the Police were urging him to press charges- if he was so hurt and aggrieved why didn't he?
No instead he was urging vengeance on twitter ( itselff a criminal offence?)
Doesn't that seem a little bizarre?
Beano wrote:Foxy wrote:Another thing is Pearce said the Police were urging him to press charges- if he was so hurt and aggrieved why didn't he?
No instead he was urging vengeance on twitter ( itselff a criminal offence?)
Doesn't that seem a little bizarre?
The only bizarre thing is you trying to deflect the issue away from the alleged vile comments.
The actions of any of the parties post incident are irrelevant.
DoomMerchant wrote:I find it bizarre that a fan of our club wouldn't back a player of ours who is usually so calm and unassuming and hasn't given the club a minutes trouble in 3 years. Clearly something aggravated Pearce more than we've ever seen before. He might have heard racism before, but like most things in life, there's differing levels - who knows how bad it could have been?
Personally I trust the reactions of a lad we've seen over a hundred times.
I guess apologists for racism hold only loyalties to their 'own kind'.
DoomMerchant wrote:I find it bizarre that a fan of our club wouldn't back a player of ours who is usually so calm and unassuming and hasn't given the club a minutes trouble in 3 years. Clearly something aggravated Pearce more than we've ever seen before. He might have heard racism before, but like most things in life, there's differing levels - who knows how bad it could have been?
Personally I trust the reactions of a lad we've seen over a hundred times.
I guess apologists for racism hold only loyalties to their 'own kind'.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], bobbystagsfan, Costastag, e4d0, Hitchcocks size 10s, patstag, zod and 342 guests