HitchcocksShins wrote:Why is no one mentioning any of our youth players in the starting 11? Do you all hate our youth set up? You all disgust me
MTFCMusings wrote:The youngsters that have impressed me so far are Noah Stokes, James Clarke and Tyrese Sinclair.
Hope we get to see Tyrese today.
BH_Stag wrote:HitchcocksShins wrote:Why is no one mentioning any of our youth players in the starting 11? Do you all hate our youth set up? You all disgust me
Can’t figure out if this is a wind up
cassellswasmagic wrote:The thing with the Cook signing for me is that Rose has some true competition which could spur him on hopefully. There’s a decent player in there. Also inversely Cook has to perform too. The only player imo without competition is Maynard and we needn’t worry about him. I’m happy with the squad so far.
ParisStag wrote:I'd go for 442 with
No Breaks Allowed wrote:What ever Dempster does, he’s got to show some balls and drop CJ to bench, if he doesn’t fit into the formation. Not like Flitcroft where second half of last season, CJ was playing 3-4 different positions in a game. My own personal opinion, is CJ is better as a impact sub, with his pase and energy, he’ll cause more damage when opposition is tired.
Users browsing this forum: arsene wengers coat, Big yella, BigGuy, gazza1988, Gruff, Hitchcocks size 10s, Jamie, london amber stag, MansfieldMick, NG17_stag, Paulstag, Stringy, The Source, Woodclanger 1 and 39 guests