{ the forum }
 
An independent supporters' website dedicated to Mansfield Town FC

Stagsnet report

Discuss all things Stags and Football League Two, and share stuff using our BBCodes.
Forum rules
Please read the Posting Rules before participating. Posting on the forums is subject to adhering to these.
Also, see the Guidelines for Posting. Moderators may sometimes tidy posts which do not follow these customs.

Stagsnet report

Postby Martin Shaw » Sat Feb 20, 2021 10:54 pm

"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 28974
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby Martin Shaw » Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:47 pm

detailed report now on
"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 28974
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby Martin Shaw » Mon Feb 22, 2021 10:32 am

my player ratings now on
"Four points clear as Lincoln are McCaffreyised", CHAD headline, April 1975
Martin Shaw
Site Admin
 
Posts: 28974
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 6:20 pm
Location: West London

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby chip63 » Mon Feb 22, 2021 12:43 pm

Martin Shaw wrote:my player ratings now on


Ouch a 4. Hope he's not a player that lacks confidence after one bad game.

Was it unfair to judge ball control and kicking on a windy bad pitch?
chip63
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 3043
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 12:01 am

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby Hjeldefan » Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:11 pm

5.5 for Stone was very generous in my opinion.
Hjeldefan
Assistant Manager
Assistant Manager
 
Posts: 1266
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 4:43 pm

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby smulls » Mon Feb 22, 2021 1:51 pm

Hjeldefan wrote:5.5 for Stone was very generous in my opinion.


Yep, 4.5 for Stone.
smulls
Subs Bench
Subs Bench
 
Posts: 565
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:41 am

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby Spiritater » Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:02 pm

Says a lot about how poor we were when Jason came on for 30m and got Marty's MOTM.
Really hope for Jay this is the beginning and not just a flash in t'pan. He's waited long enough for a chance and now's the best time to impress Nigel. Win lose or draw, if you're the best on the pitch you can do no more.
Theirs not to reason why
Theirs but to do and die
Into the valley of Death
Rode the Six Hundred
Spiritater
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 25529
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Somewhere fluffy.

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby Spiritater » Mon Feb 22, 2021 2:05 pm

smulls wrote:
Hjeldefan wrote:5.5 for Stone was very generous in my opinion.


Yep, 4.5 for Stone.

Non Stech's already undercut that with a 4
Theirs not to reason why
Theirs but to do and die
Into the valley of Death
Rode the Six Hundred
Spiritater
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 25529
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 7:18 pm
Location: Somewhere fluffy.

Re: Stagsnet report

Postby gazza1988 » Mon Feb 22, 2021 3:11 pm

I thought Reid did better than a 4.5. He was dispossessed 11 times (I think someone posted the stats somewhere) but how many of those were him trying to hold onto the ball with 2/3/4 defenders on him and not a yellow shirt near him? Do we expect a forward like Reid to be able to hold off that many players? Matt Rhead would have struggled.

He got a bit of service and even less support.
post meanings:
I know what I'm doing
Just guessing
You're an idiot and I'm poking you with a stick
User avatar
gazza1988
Manager
Manager
 
Posts: 18200
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Beeston, Nottingham


Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dave Wayne, mans_field, Son Of Sherwood, Stagstown and 145 guests