Sedgwick wrote:Gruff wrote:-------------------- Stone ---------------------
O'Keefe -- O'Driscoll -- Sweeney -- Benning
----------------------Perch---------------------
----------- Clarke ----------- Charsley--------
------ Reid----------------------McLaughlin--
---------------------- Cook --------------------
Labslie would be in for Charsely if available
Can switch to 442 without subs
Can switch to 433 and bring Maynard on for McLaughlan
Sorted...
Reid on the wing... one up front? brilliant how opinions differ so much
Gruff wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Gruff wrote:-------------------- Stone ---------------------
O'Keefe -- O'Driscoll -- Sweeney -- Benning
----------------------Perch---------------------
----------- Clarke ----------- Charsley--------
------ Reid----------------------McLaughlin--
---------------------- Cook --------------------
Labslie would be in for Charsely if available
Can switch to 442 without subs
Can switch to 433 and bring Maynard on for McLaughlan
Sorted...
Reid on the wing... one up front? brilliant how opinions differ so much
Nah.. Reid and McLaughlin playing behind Cook in defined attacking midfield roles to pick up the knock backs and run onto the flick-ons.
Makes their defence either push up or drop back, not possible to mark without changing the opposition formation and disrupting their midfield and defence... trust me
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:First names on the team sheet: Stone and Cook.
georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
Gruff wrote:I'd take the chance on Cook with a man-mark/one-on-one.... Thank you.
Other 2 centre backs pushing up to pick up our AM's, then we can have a sprint to get to the ball played inside, or we're running at them with the ball
Make the opposition think. If everybody is playing 532 or 442, make them adapt to cover something different.... Start with Plan C, and move back to Plan A & B if you're struggling.
(and that's more plans than I've noticed at t'Mill in the past 10 years)
pemill wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
I was very undecided between O'Keefe and Gordan but thought a change is a s good as a rest, I plumped for Gordon as I thought he's probably edges it as an out & out right back. I did consider Gordon and O'Keefe pushing on but Charsley seems effective down that side.
gazza1988 wrote:Sedgwick wrote:gazza1988 wrote:He can't swap the entire 11, according to the rules, can he?
Thats just the cup competition that were not in.
I wasn't sure. I knew it was the rule in the cup but couldn't remember if there was similar wording for league games, to prevent teams putting out severely weakened teams against certain opponents.
Parkinsons Perm wrote:pemill wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
I was very undecided between O'Keefe and Gordan but thought a change is a s good as a rest, I plumped for Gordon as I thought he's probably edges it as an out & out right back. I did consider Gordon and O'Keefe pushing on but Charsley seems effective down that side.
Gordon or O'Keefe, neither can defend.
Gordon's efforts at defending last season were woeful
S7AGS wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:pemill wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
I was very undecided between O'Keefe and Gordan but thought a change is a s good as a rest, I plumped for Gordon as I thought he's probably edges it as an out & out right back. I did consider Gordon and O'Keefe pushing on but Charsley seems effective down that side.
Gordon or O'Keefe, neither can defend.
Gordon's efforts at defending last season were woeful
If Gordon can’t defend why isn’t the club looking to ‘convert’ him to being an out an out winger or whatever...I believe he was a winger at Derby so why have we pigeonholed him? He seems to have pace and running power and from memory (not seen much of him) I have always thought he looks good when we are attacking better physicality than our current wide options? Or am I missing something about him?
Parkinsons Perm wrote:pemill wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
I was very undecided between O'Keefe and Gordan but thought a change is a s good as a rest, I plumped for Gordon as I thought he's probably edges it as an out & out right back. I did consider Gordon and O'Keefe pushing on but Charsley seems effective down that side.
Gordon or O'Keefe, neither can defend.
Gordon's efforts at defending last season were woeful
pemill wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:pemill wrote:georgefostersbeard wrote:What is the thinking behind Gordon for O'Keefe?
I do get that he has become less effective /confident but not convinced Gordon is the answer. I would keep O'Keefe if it was a back four
I was very undecided between O'Keefe and Gordan but thought a change is a s good as a rest, I plumped for Gordon as I thought he's probably edges it as an out & out right back. I did consider Gordon and O'Keefe pushing on but Charsley seems effective down that side.
Gordon or O'Keefe, neither can defend.
Gordon's efforts at defending last season were woeful
Everyone's efforts were woeful last season, in all fairness I'd forget about Clarke, I'll revise my team selection to have James Clarke in at RB
Captain Cunno wrote:We have the most stubborn manager since Cox on board.
Neither were willing to change their formation or style of play...
We know what happened to Cox in the end ...
The same will happen to GC.
geoffhill wrote:Cook and Maynard are a must to start.Gordon is not a wing back.Could be ok as a right wingerI would like to see Sinclair given a start as both Clark and Lapslie not available. No easy games now just hope we can have an improvement on Saturday as we were as bad as I have seen.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: robda1st, Sneag, Staggyfox and 302 guests