MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
James wrote:Why did McGuire play?
James wrote:Why did McGuire play?
James wrote:Why did McGuire play?
MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
one f in mansfield wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
Cocky little buggers learn a lot when less talented but bigger misters kick lumps out of you .
one f in mansfield wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
Cocky little buggers learn a lot when less talented but bigger misters kick lumps out of you .
Amber Andy wrote:one f in mansfield wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
Cocky little buggers learn a lot when less talented but bigger misters kick lumps out of you .
I don't know if you were there ofim, but I don't think any of the Stags players were cocky and the Retford side where not over physical. In fact the most robust challengers and tackles came from one of our own. I shan't name him, but I'm sure you know what I mean ( nice to see he has the same enthusiasm for the game though ).
Maybe more physical than us yes, but not over physical. To say they were "completely useless at football", is unfair and insulting.MTFCMusings wrote:Amber Andy wrote:one f in mansfield wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
Cocky little buggers learn a lot when less talented but bigger misters kick lumps out of you .
I don't know if you were there ofim, but I don't think any of the Stags players were cocky and the Retford side where not over physical. In fact the most robust challengers and tackles came from one of our own. I shan't name him, but I'm sure you know what I mean ( nice to see he has the same enthusiasm for the game though ).
They were definitely more robust than us Andy, and add to that completely useless at football.
MTFCMusings wrote:They put in at least three awful challenges. It may be insulting, but also completely true. They wouldn't have scored if we were still playing now.
MTFCMusings wrote:one f in mansfield wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Tyrese Sinclair was superb, really like the look of him, as well as Noah Stokes who was really composed at the back.
Cocky little buggers learn a lot when less talented but bigger misters kick lumps out of you .
What makes you say he is cocky? He made the Retford players look stupid all night, so I'm not sure what he would've learned.
MTFCMusings wrote:They put in at least three awful challenges. It may be insulting, but also completely true. They wouldn't have scored if we were still playing now.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: northern stag, Phill, spizz fan and 262 guests