zygon2003 wrote:Thanks. Interesting. He explanded further anywhere?
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:David Flitcroft did not do much media work compared to Paul Cox and Adam Murray. He only usually did an interview on a Thursday and a post match interview. I don't think he always did a pre-match interview which may have annoyed Chippers at BBC Radio Nottingham.
DF came across as a decent bloke but I don't think he was particularly keen on media work or making himself available for an interview. Robin Chipperfield may therefore have concluded he was uncooperative.
Personally I think DF was right to cut back on the number of manager's interviews. Familiarity can sometimes breed contempt as happened with some fans with Paul Cox. I thought one interview a week was enough.
steiner wrote:Cant even remember the last time I even listened to any managers interviews, cliche after cliche of rehashed gobbledegook that left you more confused than when you started to listen.
I hope Demps avoids these pointless minefields too.
Forever Optimistic wrote:The way I've been led to understand these tweets was with reference to the treatment of Anderson
gazza1988 wrote:Very strong rumour is Anderson demanded to be played at right wing (he was unhappy that Evans believed he was a right back) and he wanted to be a regular starter. Flitcroft said Central midfield or RWB because we will play with wing backs. Anderson chucked the toys out the pram (he was also unhappy at the amount of extra training compared to the season before) and refused to move on because nobody was offering the same wages we were. Also a rumour that Diamond was unhappy that we weren't building the team around Anderson.
Anderson has since moved onto league one and has managed a total of ~20 minutes in 5 sub appearances. Clearly not a massive loss.
Rob wrote:gazza1988 wrote:Very strong rumour is Anderson demanded to be played at right wing (he was unhappy that Evans believed he was a right back) and he wanted to be a regular starter. Flitcroft said Central midfield or RWB because we will play with wing backs. Anderson chucked the toys out the pram (he was also unhappy at the amount of extra training compared to the season before) and refused to move on because nobody was offering the same wages we were. Also a rumour that Diamond was unhappy that we weren't building the team around Anderson.
Anderson has since moved onto league one and has managed a total of ~20 minutes in 5 sub appearances. Clearly not a massive loss.
And was released at the end of the season, he stole Oxygen as well as money from us and has been pretty classless since he left.
True. Some act with dignity and some act like spoiled children.oldweststander wrote:That's footballers, they are human after all.
Amber Andy wrote:Lomas and Chipperfield arnt Stags fans.
To me it has as much credibility as a post on Bob's Board or the Notts County forum.
We shouldn't take much notice especially if it's tittle tattle.Dan wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Lomas and Chipperfield arnt Stags fans.
To me it has as much credibility as a post on Bob's Board or the Notts County forum.
What's that got to do with it!?
Amber Andy wrote:We shouldn't take much notice especially if it's tittle tattle.Dan wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Lomas and Chipperfield arnt Stags fans.
To me it has as much credibility as a post on Bob's Board or the Notts County forum.
What's that got to do with it!?
Dan wrote:Amber Andy wrote:We shouldn't take much notice especially if it's tittle tattle.Dan wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Lomas and Chipperfield arnt Stags fans.
To me it has as much credibility as a post on Bob's Board or the Notts County forum.
What's that got to do with it!?
They saw Flitcroft 2-3 times a week (or were meant to ) yet you don't think we should listen to what they say!? You're unbelievable. Yet if they said anything bad about Steve Evans you'd believe every word!!!
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 194 guests