Bradders wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Graham should have been the sub (if there had to be one), he’s a natural striker and would have stayed higher up the pitch.
Graham came on against Cambridge in the 84th minute. Four minutes later he gave the ball away and Cambridge got their equaliser. Possibly Flitcroft realised that he's a bit inexperienced for the holding role.
Conker wrote:Personally I think we are desperately one short up front, I know many argued against this one being Rob, but it’s undeniable now.
Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
The One wrote:Two points in front of County !!!!
4dstag wrote:The One wrote:Two points in front of County !!!!
4 points
The One wrote:4dstag wrote:The One wrote:Two points in front of County !!!!
4 points
Ok sorry that makes it better
Foresttownstag wrote:The One wrote:4dstag wrote:The One wrote:Two points in front of County !!!!
4 points
Ok sorry that makes it better
Don’t forget we have a game in hand as well that everyone keeps going on about
Jamie wrote:Didn't take much for you to change ya tune Andy... 2 draws. You've gone from defending everything he does to this. Wow.
I think it's unjustified to blame budget. He gets what he gets. It's based on attendances and may well be inflated by JR. Either way you got what you got. Being a striker short if DFs mistake, not a budget problem.
stagsfan6493 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
If you think we have a budget issue then you’ll never be happy. We have probably our biggest budget ever. DF had a chance to sign strikers in the summer and chose Davies and Walker.
Amber Andy wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
If you think we have a budget issue then you’ll never be happy. We have probably our biggest budget ever. DF had a chance to sign strikers in the summer and chose Davies and Walker.
Do you happen to know what our budget is ?
The budget meant we couldn't keep Angol.
Amber Andy wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
If you think we have a budget issue then you’ll never be happy. We have probably our biggest budget ever. DF had a chance to sign strikers in the summer and chose Davies and Walker.
Do you happen to know what our budget is ?
The budget meant we couldn't keep Angol.
Conker wrote:Amber Andy wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
If you think we have a budget issue then you’ll never be happy. We have probably our biggest budget ever. DF had a chance to sign strikers in the summer and chose Davies and Walker.
Do you happen to know what our budget is ?
The budget meant we couldn't keep Angol.
He can (and should) come back and ask how do you know Angol had to leave due to 'budget reasons'
I'll use a tad of common sense, but we would have not sanctioned two transfer fees and pay some or all of a championship player wages if Budget were going to be a problem.
I think it's a case of JR likely had the chance to recoup most of the money he paid for Angol and that was to good to turn down.
Amber Andy wrote:Conker wrote:Amber Andy wrote:stagsfan6493 wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Gosh this is so frustrating. DF certainly devides opinion.
I can see that we are not too far off from being a promotion contender but I also take into account the views of those that go to away games. They obviously see the negative end game tatics.
There is clearly a problem, it has happened too many times. Once or twice in a season you expect but the number of times it has happened is a big concern.
Is it the players ( on this occasion the late goal conceded was very poor marking ), but I also question DF tatics of taking a striker off.
We are definitely a good striker short, Davies being injured dosen't help. I think it is a budget issue but that's another debate.
I hope it can be sorted by DF because I think he's as good as we can get. However, it's a problem he must resolve quickly as the Radfords seem to be having doubts.
JR must be thinking should I stick or twist.
If you think we have a budget issue then you’ll never be happy. We have probably our biggest budget ever. DF had a chance to sign strikers in the summer and chose Davies and Walker.
Do you happen to know what our budget is ?
The budget meant we couldn't keep Angol.
He can (and should) come back and ask how do you know Angol had to leave due to 'budget reasons'
I'll use a tad of common sense, but we would have not sanctioned two transfer fees and pay some or all of a championship player wages if Budget were going to be a problem.
I think it's a case of JR likely had the chance to recoup most of the money he paid for Angol and that was to good to turn down.
OK if you say the budget wasn't the reason for us having to sell Angol or Rose, why hasn't Angol been replaced.
Evans saddled us with expensive players on two year contracts. JR eluded to that at his meeting.
Perhaps you can tell me what the budget is, as I've not had a reply to my original question.
Random Hero wrote:His win percentage is now at 13% and Belly is still defending him
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: bluenyellow, G B, Martin Shaw, Nutty Stag, Stags Head Stags and 231 guests