gazza1988 wrote:When was it said by someone at the club that he was to reduce the wage bill? Or are we assuming so because he got rid of Maynard and Cook, to make those decisions look justified?
gazza1988 wrote:When was it said by someone at the club that he was to reduce the wage bill? Or are we assuming so because he got rid of Maynard and Cook, to make those decisions look justified?
bobbystagsfan wrote:Be careful what you wish for.
Well you should know all about negativity ! I can't recall you ever posting anything remotely positive.Billy the fish wrote:If he was he’d be managing at a higher level , not very well thought of in Sheffield well the Red side of it .. negative Nigel he was fondly named
Vice President wrote:Nigel is an excellent manager at this level - as was Flitcroft. They both just missed out on promotion in their first full season.
It’s a shame we didn’t stick with Flitcroft at the time. We will learn from that and give Nigel a fair chance.
This is a long term project, and whilst I question some of his decisions - I wouldn’t want to swap him for anyone else right now.
Vice President wrote:Nigel is an excellent manager at this level - as was Flitcroft. They both just missed out on promotion in their first full season.
It’s a shame we didn’t stick with Flitcroft at the time. We will learn from that and give Nigel a fair chance.
This is a long term project, and whilst I question some of his decisions - I wouldn’t want to swap him for anyone else right now.
Chrisuknottm wrote:Vice President wrote:Nigel is an excellent manager at this level - as was Flitcroft. They both just missed out on promotion in their first full season.
It’s a shame we didn’t stick with Flitcroft at the time. We will learn from that and give Nigel a fair chance.
This is a long term project, and whilst I question some of his decisions - I wouldn’t want to swap him for anyone else right now.
Totally agree with this post but I am frustrated that since losing Cook, Maynard and Johnson as pure goalscorers he is stubbornly sticking to not needing a 20 goals a year striker on the premis that his midfielders all contribute 5 to 10 each which hasn't happened and that the recruitment of Swan is not the answer at League 2 level
I meant for us.We have signed these 20 plus a season strikers and they have not done it for us. Give Swan a chance ? Was Chris Greenacre a 20 plus a season goalscorer before he came to us ? Or Matt Green for instance.Vice President wrote:Maynard scored enough goals to get Bury promoted the previous season and the jury is still out on whether Johnson can help get Walsall promoted this season.
But it’s not about whether we should have kept either of them - it’s about who have we replaced them with … and are the replacements scoring enough goals?
So what do you suggest we do about it ? Who would you suggest would be better ?Johnny H wrote:To answer the question in the Title Thread......
No !
Johnny H wrote:We stick with him......but hope he stops his insistence on utility players instead of proper centre halfs and goal scorers !!!
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: bob ledgers barber, Martian, robbingdog and 18 guests