broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:broomo wrote:bellwhiff wrote:broomo wrote:I think I heard or read it's the first time in 40 odd years Stags have won 5 games in a row in all competitions?
No he doesn't have a clue. He probably tells the lads to stop doing what they've been doing the minute we go on a decent run.
40 years ?
You show again that you know nothing.
Check out when we won the Conference
Did "you" win your FA Cup game during that 5 match (or probably longer) winning streak?
5 games across all competitions was the quote and I didn't come up with the quote. Someone else did.
2013 we won 12 (I think) in a row in all competitions.
But you wouldn’t know that.
12/13 you won 12 in a row in the Conference, all league games. No cup games involved.
And I would know that. You know why I would know it?
I'd know it because it equalled the record for the most consecutive wins in the Conference.
You know whose record it equalled? Nigel Clough's Burton Albion.
broomo wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:gazza1988 wrote:It was the first time we we'd won 5 in a row in all comps since Steve Evans 5 years ago. In fact it was nearly the same run, started with checkatrade trophy win against Everton u23s(Harry Charsley played for Everton that game) it also included a FA Cup 1st round win vs Shaw Lane and 3 league victories.
That was mention in an interview I think it was Mondays.
it was 4 years ago. It was in my report on Saturday, the first paragragh. I gave the stat to Mark and he quoted it in the interview with Nigel Clough on Monday.
Hands up. I went in two footed.
I read that article and one on the BBC and somehow saw 4 as 40. I even thought to myself 40 sounded ridiculous.
Still what's 36 between friends eh?
Eh?
CassellsCap wrote:Yes he does have a clue . A lot of those players are running on empty and have put in some big performances of late. Sutton are a good team and we got beat . It happens. Let’s go again . COYS.
diablo wrote:broomo wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:gazza1988 wrote:It was the first time we we'd won 5 in a row in all comps since Steve Evans 5 years ago. In fact it was nearly the same run, started with checkatrade trophy win against Everton u23s(Harry Charsley played for Everton that game) it also included a FA Cup 1st round win vs Shaw Lane and 3 league victories.
That was mention in an interview I think it was Mondays.
it was 4 years ago. It was in my report on Saturday, the first paragragh. I gave the stat to Mark and he quoted it in the interview with Nigel Clough on Monday.
Hands up. I went in two footed.
I read that article and one on the BBC and somehow saw 4 as 40. I even thought to myself 40 sounded ridiculous.
Still what's 36 between friends eh?
Eh?
Broomo have you ever actually played football ?
dukeofportland wrote:and this is why i only come to stagsnet a few times a year - what a plank!
gazza1988 wrote:dukeofportland wrote:and this is why i only come to stagsnet a few times a year - what a plank!
you don't have to write off a whole messageboard because of the posts of one user, sometimes it's just worth taking 30 seconds to look at the other posts of the said user to give you context and decide whether you want to give the comments of that user any credence.
To do this, click on the user's username, then click on search user's posts, and you'll get all of that user's posts in the last two years
For example, for that particular user
https://stagsnet.net/phpBB3/search.php? ... 9&sr=posts
There are 9 posts in total.
7 of which are in the last 12 months.
Of those 7: 3 are very critical of Nigel Clough
"Does Nigel have a clue ?"
"Please accept responsibility for today's utter shambles"
"I think it's about time NC was honest in his post match comments."
and the other 4 are all saying that James Clarke is the best right back at the club.
Now you can decide whether to write off an entire messageboard, or just ignore the posts of that user. There is a foe function to not see their posts.
bobbystagsfan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:dukeofportland wrote:and this is why i only come to stagsnet a few times a year - what a plank!
you don't have to write off a whole messageboard because of the posts of one user, sometimes it's just worth taking 30 seconds to look at the other posts of the said user to give you context and decide whether you want to give the comments of that user any credence.
To do this, click on the user's username, then click on search user's posts, and you'll get all of that user's posts in the last two years
For example, for that particular user
search.php?author_id=1609&sr=posts
There are 9 posts in total.
7 of which are in the last 12 months.
Of those 7: 3 are very critical of Nigel Clough
"Does Nigel have a clue ?"
"Please accept responsibility for today's utter shambles"
"I think it's about time NC was honest in his post match comments."
and the other 4 are all saying that James Clarke is the best right back at the club.
Now you can decide whether to write off an entire messageboard, or just ignore the posts of that user. There is a foe function to not see their posts.
So from your research we can clarify that OP is James Clarke's dad?
Martin Shaw wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:dukeofportland wrote:and this is why i only come to stagsnet a few times a year - what a plank!
you don't have to write off a whole messageboard because of the posts of one user, sometimes it's just worth taking 30 seconds to look at the other posts of the said user to give you context and decide whether you want to give the comments of that user any credence.
To do this, click on the user's username, then click on search user's posts, and you'll get all of that user's posts in the last two years
For example, for that particular user
https://stagsnet.net/phpBB3/search.php? ... 9&sr=posts
There are 9 posts in total.
7 of which are in the last 12 months.
Of those 7: 3 are very critical of Nigel Clough
"Does Nigel have a clue ?"
"Please accept responsibility for today's utter shambles"
"I think it's about time NC was honest in his post match comments."
and the other 4 are all saying that James Clarke is the best right back at the club.
Now you can decide whether to write off an entire messageboard, or just ignore the posts of that user. There is a foe function to not see their posts.
So from your research we can clarify that OP is James Clarke's dad?
No, it isn't.
bobbystagsfan wrote:Martin Shaw wrote:bobbystagsfan wrote:gazza1988 wrote:dukeofportland wrote:and this is why i only come to stagsnet a few times a year - what a plank!
you don't have to write off a whole messageboard because of the posts of one user, sometimes it's just worth taking 30 seconds to look at the other posts of the said user to give you context and decide whether you want to give the comments of that user any credence.
To do this, click on the user's username, then click on search user's posts, and you'll get all of that user's posts in the last two years
For example, for that particular user
search.php?author_id=1609&sr=posts
There are 9 posts in total.
7 of which are in the last 12 months.
Of those 7: 3 are very critical of Nigel Clough
"Does Nigel have a clue ?"
"Please accept responsibility for today's utter shambles"
"I think it's about time NC was honest in his post match comments."
and the other 4 are all saying that James Clarke is the best right back at the club.
Now you can decide whether to write off an entire messageboard, or just ignore the posts of that user. There is a foe function to not see their posts.
So from your research we can clarify that OP is James Clarke's dad?
No, it isn't.
I'll stick to Iyesden Christie rather than Agatha
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: awalkinthepark, Dave Wayne, hucknall stag, Scothie the Stag, Slackythestag, Son Of Sherwood and 171 guests