Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Paulstag wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
What a melt he is.
Dan wrote:Paulstag wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
What a melt he is.
So easy
MTFCMusings wrote:I think it’s George Lapslie.
Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Chander Lear wrote::lol:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Richard Cranium wrote:Chander Lear wrote::lol:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Sedgwick wrote:Did he play against us in the FA cup?
Captain Cunno wrote::lol:Richard Cranium wrote:Chander Lear wrote::lol:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Parkinsons Perm wrote:Am i missing something here?
Whats with the adulation for another midfielder when we get over run anyway because of the god damn awful set up and tactics?
I think our midfield would be fine if used in a more dare i say it, "old fashioned" formation
Just cant see what hes going to bring to the table if its the same negative set up?
Parkinsons Perm wrote:Am i missing something here?
Whats with the adulation for another midfielder when we get over run anyway because of the god damn awful set up and tactics?
I think our midfield would be fine if used in a more dare i say it, "old fashioned" formation
Just cant see what hes going to bring to the table if its the same negative set up?
spanishstag wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:Am i missing something here?
Whats with the adulation for another midfielder when we get over run anyway because of the god damn awful set up and tactics?
I think our midfield would be fine if used in a more dare i say it, "old fashioned" formation
Just cant see what hes going to bring to the table if its the same negative set up?
Think your missing something ,our manager thinks hes a good addition thats good enough for me
Chander Lear wrote::lol:Sedgwick wrote:Dan wrote:Definitely Cummings. Should be interesting to say the least!
Parkinsons Perm wrote:spanishstag wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:Am i missing something here?
Whats with the adulation for another midfielder when we get over run anyway because of the god damn awful set up and tactics?
I think our midfield would be fine if used in a more dare i say it, "old fashioned" formation
Just cant see what hes going to bring to the table if its the same negative set up?
Think your missing something ,our manager thinks hes a good addition thats good enough for me
He thinks Stech is a good goalie and Bowery a good striker so that means squat diddly
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Stoney and 261 guests