Sharp wrote:Good luck to him, astonished he's not found another club already.
oldweststander wrote:Pierce is certainly a cut above what we currently have on show.
stag324 wrote:Sharp wrote:Good luck to him, astonished he's not found another club already.
makes you wonder why....
spainmick wrote:In his earlier years at Mansfield he was....last year he certainly wasn't up to a high level...too many mistakes and too slow
Tippy Tappy Football wrote:Farrend Rawson is a no nonsense head it and kick it centre half but Krystian Pearce is a better defender and is better on the ball as he can bring it out of defence if necessary. He's also quicker
I think it was a big mistake to release the Chief and is probably due to a clash of personalities than for footballing reasons. Krystian seems to be being blamed for the JD failure. He was clearly unhappy after DF left. It's a shame because GC got Krystian back to his best after he was initially dropped after a bust up about GC's additional training sessions.
oldweststander wrote:Pierce is certainly a cut above what we currently have on show.
Vice President wrote:oldweststander wrote:Pierce is certainly a cut above what we currently have on show.
I agree.
Our defence is weaker now.
Parkinsons Perm wrote:spainmick wrote:In his earlier years at Mansfield he was....last year he certainly wasn't up to a high level...too many mistakes and too slow
Have you seen this season's back three?
Vice President wrote:oldweststander wrote:Pierce is certainly a cut above what we currently have on show.
I agree.
Our defence is weaker now.
Sedgwick wrote:Parkinsons Perm wrote:spainmick wrote:In his earlier years at Mansfield he was....last year he certainly wasn't up to a high level...too many mistakes and too slow
Have you seen this season's back three?
They've played 3 games together, shut up.
ParisStag wrote:As much as I loved Pearce, he is a player in decline and we are going with players on the rise. All 3 of our defenders are good, promising players who will only improve. Sweeney will be a better ball player and defender than Pearce ever was and Rawson and Rollin, who are different types of player entirely, will do well in the game. It's more important that we have players who fit our team togetherness and system.
James wrote:ParisStag wrote:As much as I loved Pearce, he is a player in decline and we are going with players on the rise. All 3 of our defenders are good, promising players who will only improve. Sweeney will be a better ball player and defender than Pearce ever was and Rawson and Rollin, who are different types of player entirely, will do well in the game. It's more important that we have players who fit our team togetherness and system.
I always thought Pearce's ball playing ability was over egged a bit, but to say Sweeney is a better ball player than Pearce is just wrong. Sweeney isn't good on the ball at all, in fact, probably the weakest of our defenders at the minute.
James wrote:ParisStag wrote:As much as I loved Pearce, he is a player in decline and we are going with players on the rise. All 3 of our defenders are good, promising players who will only improve. Sweeney will be a better ball player and defender than Pearce ever was and Rawson and Rollin, who are different types of player entirely, will do well in the game. It's more important that we have players who fit our team togetherness and system.
I always thought Pearce's ball playing ability was over egged a bit, but to say Sweeney is a better ball player than Pearce is just wrong. Sweeney isn't good on the ball at all, in fact, probably the weakest of our defenders at the minute.
James wrote:I think L2 is about Sweeney's level in my opinion. He's a decent L2 defender, but nothing more. I wouldn't say he's improved with us in 2 years either, so not sure where you're expecting a sudden improvement to make him a future Championship defender.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: BarnsleyStag, lifestags, MTFCMusings, Ralphy, Sandy Pate Best Stag, Stephen and 118 guests