The One wrote:Spiritater wrote:True Sneag we did. We'd seen us chuck it away previous. Then in the first PO game in Wales we managed how many? 286 Feel good factor eh. Yeah righto.
We took over twice as many to Hereford
The Welsh game was televised was MK game... no.was Hereford no....do not let facts get in way of your rant.
Sweden Stag wrote:Keep to topic please, folks.
Spiritater wrote:The One wrote:Spiritater wrote:True Sneag we did. We'd seen us chuck it away previous. Then in the first PO game in Wales we managed how many? 286 Feel good factor eh. Yeah righto.
We took over twice as many to Hereford
The Welsh game was televised was MK game... no.was Hereford no....do not let facts get in way of your rant.
I always thought our away games were on ifollow, didn't they cover MK? The 2nd leg was televised too and Newport brought over 1k. The feel good was there for them but not us. Your insistance that JD takes all the blame for our position now is so wrong, the seeds of this shambles were sown long before.
BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
Spiritater wrote:Newport KO 6pm hardly afternoon,
Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
I agree, even though I will always maintain it was wrong to sack DF, nevertheless we had a very poor end to the season and squandered automatic promotion. My take is, that getting us into the top three (with what now appears not to have been a top 3 budget) was enough to give him chance this season to rectify it. We didn't and then compounded the error by appointing an unproven rookie, that's OK if you're longer term aim is promotion, but our promotion aim is here and now - or should I say was! As for the feel good factor, overall last season was the most enjoyable for me since our promotion under Dearden/Watkiss. Yes the Conference win was the most important season, but honestly some of the football was so bad I wanted to cry! The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
He didn't get us in the top 3 Rob. If he had he would have kept his job.
Sweden Stag wrote:(enough written)
Stag on the Beach wrote:Sweden Stag wrote:(enough written)
Exactly. So why keep going on about it?
Sweden Stag wrote:Keep to topic please, folks.
Sweden Stag wrote:Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
He didn't get us in the top 3 Rob. If he had he would have kept his job.
The refereeing at Newport was easily the worst I've ever seen in any Stags game I have been able to watch either live or on telly over here in Sweden. That ref cost us the possibility of playing sides like Ipswich and Sunderland this season. That ref, whom we thankfully have avoided so far this season, has in 25 games so far this season dished out 110 yellow cards and a staggering TWELVE red cards.
Other posters on here might have seen the Eddie Ilderton farce against Bristol City in late 2002 (enough written) and a couple of Darren Drysdale (another one we haven't had so far this season) horror shows up to the 2013-14 season (home fixture against York and also the MK Dons home game in October 2007) live. Mr Drysdale has had better games after the York fiasco in March 2014. But he reffed our final home game against Stevenage last season. Tbh, I felt worried when I learnt of that appointment. Very poor from the EFL considering the fact that Mr Drysdale when relegated to the Conf for the 2009-10 reffed our home game against Stevenage which ended our unbeaten home run spread over two seasons under the management of Dave Holdsworth.
Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
I agree, even though I will always maintain it was wrong to sack DF, nevertheless we had a very poor end to the season and squandered automatic promotion. My take is, that getting us into the top three (with what now appears not to have been a top 3 budget) was enough to give him chance this season to rectify it. We didn't and then compounded the error by appointing an unproven rookie, that's OK if you're longer term aim is promotion, but our promotion aim is here and now - or should I say was! As for the feel good factor, overall last season was the most enjoyable for me since our promotion under Dearden/Watkiss. Yes the Conference win was the most important season, but honestly some of the football was so bad I wanted to cry! The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
He didn't get us in the top 3 Rob. If he had he would have kept his job.
Rob wrote:Sneag wrote:Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
I agree, even though I will always maintain it was wrong to sack DF, nevertheless we had a very poor end to the season and squandered automatic promotion. My take is, that getting us into the top three (with what now appears not to have been a top 3 budget) was enough to give him chance this season to rectify it. We didn't and then compounded the error by appointing an unproven rookie, that's OK if you're longer term aim is promotion, but our promotion aim is here and now - or should I say was! As for the feel good factor, overall last season was the most enjoyable for me since our promotion under Dearden/Watkiss. Yes the Conference win was the most important season, but honestly some of the football was so bad I wanted to cry! The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
He didn't get us in the top 3 Rob. If he had he would have kept his job.
Is that the criteria now then? Bugger progress, entertainment, challenge; top 3 or else? It's an appalling strategy which will see us change manager every 6 months. I never met DF and despite what the immature on here say, am no DF lover. What I am is a realist, I know our place in the pyramid and I want to watch good football. Martin and I have disagreed over this for a few decades, I want good football, first and foremost, success will then follow. I don't want to be a disgusting long ball team. Life is too short, my couple of hours at the Mill should be entertaining, not tortuous as it was under Cox in the FL. Last season was great, the atmosphere was superb and we saw some superb games (Bury game is in my top 3 all time), but the owners sacked DF and now we lay in a pool of secrement so bad it makes the early 80's look nostalgic. You got your wish Sneag, I am sure you will never admit it, but I guess you do wish we played the football we did last season and were top 3 or thereabouts all year rather than the current relegation battle. I hope GC is the man, I hope he gives you top 3 next season for if not you will be after his head. Have to say, early signs are not good, the best teams in every division are almost always the ones that play the best football.
Conker wrote:Rob didn’t blame Flitcroft employer for his sacking though, even though they quite literally sacked him. he blamed the fans.
Gotta admit though, last season was enjoyable overall (ignore the end) but I slightly enjoyed the season before under Evans(before he a runner) - we beat pretty much every team in the top seven, Lincoln and Coventry away in particular were fantastic.
Rob wrote:BigGuy wrote:It didn’t in my opinion, even with us trying to stumble over the line there was still a buzz up to the MK game.
We wouldn’t have too over 5,000 otherwise.
I agree, even though I will always maintain it was wrong to sack DF, nevertheless we had a very poor end to the season and squandered automatic promotion. My take is, that getting us into the top three (with what now appears not to have been a top 3 budget) was enough to give him chance this season to rectify it. We didn't and then compounded the error by appointing an unproven rookie, that's OK if you're longer term aim is promotion, but our promotion aim is here and now - or should I say was! As for the feel good factor, overall last season was the most enjoyable for me since our promotion under Dearden/Watkiss. Yes the Conference win was the most important season, but honestly some of the football was so bad I wanted to cry! The feel good factor pretty much ended with an horrific refereeing decision at Newport and the unbelievable chances missed in the home leg.
You can use stats to whatever end suits your argument and I note that of all the stats for the first ten games Holdsworth's record is the best - just shows how utterly meaningless a first ten game stat is
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Amber Andy, awalkinthepark, BigGuy, groundhoppingstag, Leigh5t, Lurker Dan 95, Martin Shaw, mc4590, St Hilary Stag, steiner, West Ham 1969 and 101 guests