Yey another negative Manager

[Billy the fish]

The ideal substitution for Maynard would have been cookey but we’ve decided a under contract player would be Better on loan at another club . There was no reason at all to shuffle the defence very poor decision making from GC but I guess it’s another point on the board

[EdwinstoweStag]

The ideal substitution for Maynard would have been cookey but we’ve decided a under contract player would be Better on loan at another club . There was no reason at all to shuffle the defence very poor decision making from GC but I guess it’s another point on the board

I’ve suggested to GC that he consults with you before he makes any future substitutions.

[Jamie]

The ideal substitution for Maynard would have been cookey but we’ve decided a under contract player would be Better on loan at another club . There was no reason at all to shuffle the defence very poor decision making from GC but I guess it’s another point on the board

CJ was the ideal replacement. Bring him on to chase and press when Maynards out of stream. I agree moving the defensive around was a poor decision.

[Harrington St Stag]

I don’t find GC a negative manager but it’s obvious he’s trying to get the players he’s inherited plus a few newbies to cover off the season and then it’s time to rebuild.

I like his determined style and the fact he’s now pushing the players. Overall I’m glad he’s with us and I reckon he’ll get us going next season.

I was happy with the CJ change on Saturday and don’t think bringing on MP was the cause of the equaliser. That was sloppy defending by everyone involved.

[diablo]

There were four players who could have done better to prevent the equaliser. And none of them was Preston.

Actually there were 11 players who should have done better

[Spiritater]

GC must be a positive guy. According to t'Beeb he says we're on the right track and there's only been one poor performance in his time in charge. Hmmmm Oldham, Grimsby