geoffhill wrote:Macca was mom because the rest were so poor.
WVStag wrote:Not one Mansfield player played well today and Coughlan tactically got it wrong.
When down to 10 men, generally always become more organised and resolute because they have to be. In these times, you have to have the ability to break teams down with some creativity and we did not have it. Bringing Bishop off and switching to a narrow CF trio was an error. Instead, we played with an asymmetrical 433 with only one 'wide' player, CJ, who was poor today. Widening the pitch is critical (and obvious) to opening up space between the opposition. We didn't do that.
Coughlan claimed he 'couldn't have done anymore' and I do not agree at all. He got the shape wrong, as well as the personnel in my view. Khan should've been introduced when we needed more creativity and the reshuffle of shape was ineffectual.
Both manager and players let us down today.
cassellswasmagic wrote:GC will be getting rid of most of this lot on June 1st.
WVStag wrote:Not one Mansfield player played well today and Coughlan tactically got it wrong.
When down to 10 men, generally always become more organised and resolute because they have to be. In these times, you have to have the ability to break teams down with some creativity and we did not have it. Bringing Bishop off and switching to a narrow CF trio was an error. Instead, we played with an asymmetrical 433 with only one 'wide' player, CJ, who was poor today. Widening the pitch is critical (and obvious) to opening up space between the opposition. We didn't do that.
Coughlan claimed he 'couldn't have done anymore' and I do not agree at all. He got the shape wrong, as well as the personnel in my view. Khan should've been introduced when we needed more creativity and the reshuffle of shape was ineffectual.
Both manager and players let us down today.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:WVStag wrote:Not one Mansfield player played well today and Coughlan tactically got it wrong.
When down to 10 men, generally always become more organised and resolute because they have to be. In these times, you have to have the ability to break teams down with some creativity and we did not have it. Bringing Bishop off and switching to a narrow CF trio was an error. Instead, we played with an asymmetrical 433 with only one 'wide' player, CJ, who was poor today. Widening the pitch is critical (and obvious) to opening up space between the opposition. We didn't do that.
Coughlan claimed he 'couldn't have done anymore' and I do not agree at all. He got the shape wrong, as well as the personnel in my view. Khan should've been introduced when we needed more creativity and the reshuffle of shape was ineffectual.
Both manager and players let us down today.
But we had our most creative player according to many on here still on the pitch, Mellis?
He went missing again as at Shrewsbury against 10 men, woeful!!
wardy12345 wrote:Just listened to the post match interview and he look well p off and sounds like the players that don’t wanna work will be gone shortly
Beano wrote:Mass clearout long overdue
Some of these overpaid jokers have failed for 3 consecutive seasons
They are simply not good enough
Cleveland_Stag wrote:Bishop and MacDonald have been painful to watch.
WVStag wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:WVStag wrote:Not one Mansfield player played well today and Coughlan tactically got it wrong.
When down to 10 men, generally always become more organised and resolute because they have to be. In these times, you have to have the ability to break teams down with some creativity and we did not have it. Bringing Bishop off and switching to a narrow CF trio was an error. Instead, we played with an asymmetrical 433 with only one 'wide' player, CJ, who was poor today. Widening the pitch is critical (and obvious) to opening up space between the opposition. We didn't do that.
Coughlan claimed he 'couldn't have done anymore' and I do not agree at all. He got the shape wrong, as well as the personnel in my view. Khan should've been introduced when we needed more creativity and the reshuffle of shape was ineffectual.
Both manager and players let us down today.
But we had our most creative player according to many on here still on the pitch, Mellis?
He went missing again as at Shrewsbury against 10 men, woeful!!
Mellis is our most creative player and yes he was poor today. He is not Kevin De Bruyne.
OllertonStag wrote:Why do we keep blaming successive Managers? Some/most/all of these Players have been stealing a wage for the best part of a year.
Sedgwick wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Absolutely dreadful.
Honeymoon period over.
Not convinced things have improved since JD.
Well it's the exact same players so not much will change.
Spiritater wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Absolutely dreadful.
Honeymoon period over.
Not convinced things have improved since JD.
Well it's the exact same players so not much will change.
Yes, but some on here were squealing 'it's not the players, IT'S THE MANAGER' when JD had the reins
EdwinstoweStag wrote:WVStag wrote:Not one Mansfield player played well today and Coughlan tactically got it wrong.
When down to 10 men, generally always become more organised and resolute because they have to be. In these times, you have to have the ability to break teams down with some creativity and we did not have it. Bringing Bishop off and switching to a narrow CF trio was an error. Instead, we played with an asymmetrical 433 with only one 'wide' player, CJ, who was poor today. Widening the pitch is critical (and obvious) to opening up space between the opposition. We didn't do that.
Coughlan claimed he 'couldn't have done anymore' and I do not agree at all. He got the shape wrong, as well as the personnel in my view. Khan should've been introduced when we needed more creativity and the reshuffle of shape was ineffectual.
Both manager and players let us down today.
As did the scoreboard!
Sneag wrote:Spiritater wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Absolutely dreadful.
Honeymoon period over.
Not convinced things have improved since JD.
Well it's the exact same players so not much will change.
Yes, but some on here were squealing 'it's not the players, IT'S THE MANAGER' when JD had the reins
Drifting ships take a while to turn round 'tater.
MTFCMusings wrote:Well, I haven’t seen anyone mention that we’re in a relegation battle as of yet. The meltdown hasn’t been quite as bad I expected.
arsene wengers coat wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Well, I haven’t seen anyone mention that we’re in a relegation battle as of yet. The meltdown hasn’t been quite as bad I expected.
We're not out of the woods though are we?
We probably need 20 more points this season to stay up.
Show me where they're coming from.
Spiritater wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Amber Andy wrote:Absolutely dreadful.
Honeymoon period over.
Not convinced things have improved since JD.
Well it's the exact same players so not much will change.
Yes, but some on here were squealing 'it's not the players, IT'S THE MANAGER' when JD had the reins
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: BarnsleyStag, Cardiffstag23, diablo, gazza1988, Jamie, Scothie the Stag, Spiritater, spizz fan, St Hilary Stag, ST4GS, wayno cordiniho, yellowstagsfan and 134 guests