Robins scorefred sponsored by Full Circle

[adamstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

[Spiritater]

Take Bishop off and bring Clarke on. Move Shaugnessy to midfield and play 4-3-3 with Hamilton moving up front.

CJ has been pretty hopeless so far.

No suprise there then

[EdwinstoweStag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

[spanishstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

No it aint but adios amigos merry xmas edders

[adamstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

That’s nice, but I’m used to working with comprehensible English, so that’s a bit of a shock, it’s like my 4 year old nephew wrote it before bed.

[Spiritater]

We are in a relegation battle

We are. A bunch of spineless wasters playing for us. What's worse is they're a bunch of spineless wasters lacking one iota of confidence now. Really worried we could be visiting Meadow Lane next season

[adamstag]

We are in a relegation battle

We are. A bunch of spineless wasters playing for us. What's worse is they're a bunch of spineless wasters lacking one iota of confidence now. Really worried we could be visiting Meadow Lane next season

We are in a relegation battle, anyone who thinks otherwise is mad.

No goals in 4 games, no midfield, no manager, no hope

[spanishstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Highlight the illiteracy then adam and the context that is wrong ,then post it properly ,you cant but i await your response

[NorthLondonStag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

That’s nice, but I’m used to working with comprehensible English, so that’s a bit of a shock, it’s like my 4 year old nephew wrote it before bed.

The grammar police could be out in force significantly more on here, but it’s not necessary.

You know what he’s trying to say but you are just taking the proverbial out of him. You may have a greater command of the English language than he does, or at least the punctuation aspects of it, but you should perhaps address his arguments rather than his linguistic failings.

And yes his posts are annoying at times. And actually yours mostly make a lot of sense.

[gazza1988]

It wasn't a "bad" performance, it certainly wasn't a good one. Macca man of the match, although did resort to the Macca we all know and love after he got man of the match. CJ did some good running and tracking back. Cook did OK, had the ball in the back of the net at one point but was offside. Maynard did OK got through a few times and on one was dragged back quite clearly to everyone except the one who mattered. Bishop was hot and cold. Mellis did well. The back 3 and Benning did OK just switched off when it mattered most. Olejnik did OK, logan would have been criticised for 2 of the goals. Rose was a live wire when he came on, won a couple of free kicks. Khan did OK but wasn't involved enough. OSJ came on gave the ball away cheaply a few times but only got 15 minutes,

Don't know whether it's because he's not one of ours he escapes criticism but midfield or centre half Shaughnessy is dire

There's a decent player in there. He showed it early doors but, like the rest of em, he's gone missing.

[Bradders]

It wasn't a "bad" performance, it certainly wasn't a good one. Macca man of the match, although did resort to the Macca we all know and love after he got man of the match. CJ did some good running and tracking back. Cook did OK, had the ball in the back of the net at one point but was offside. Maynard did OK got through a few times and on one was dragged back quite clearly to everyone except the one who mattered. Bishop was hot and cold. Mellis did well. The back 3 and Benning did OK just switched off when it mattered most. Olejnik did OK, logan would have been criticised for 2 of the goals. Rose was a live wire when he came on, won a couple of free kicks. Khan did OK but wasn't involved enough. OSJ came on gave the ball away cheaply a few times but only got 15 minutes,

Don't know whether it's because he's not one of ours he escapes criticism but midfield or centre half Shaughnessy is dire

There's a decent player in there. He showed it early doors but, like the rest of em, he's gone missing.

Indeed, like so many signings he looked good for a match or two and then settled into a more mediocre standard. Judging from today's performance he's not comfortable in defence. But he shouldn't be singled out as the team was poor in general - not so much because of poor individual performances but more as a team. To me it was a "bad" performance, not just "not good". Cheltenham should have been subject to a fierce battle in the second half, but in fact they won at a canter and would probably be happy to play us again tomorrow if it counted for three points more.

[spanishstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

That’s nice, but I’m used to working with comprehensible English, so that’s a bit of a shock, it’s like my 4 year old nephew wrote it before bed.

The grammar police could be out in force significantly more on here, but it’s not necessary.

You know what he’s trying to say but you are just taking the proverbial out of him. You may have a greater command of the English language than he does, or at least the punctuation aspects of it, but you should perhaps address his arguments rather than his linguistic failings.

And yes his posts are annoying at times. And actually yours mostly make a lot of sense.

Actually NLS my posts may be annoying to some ,but they are my views ,and if my punctuation ,which is probably not the most essential thing in my life ,is a failing then i must apologize NOT ,my posts are honest, probably upsetting to some ,but never the less my views, you see i believe in certain values in life ,honesty ,trust ,and first and foremost LOYALTY they were values instilled in me by my parents ,and values i have never lost , thats why i still follow stags ,and why i detest some of the posters on here

[EdwinstoweStag]

It wasn't a "bad" performance, it certainly wasn't a good one. Macca man of the match, although did resort to the Macca we all know and love after he got man of the match. CJ did some good running and tracking back. Cook did OK, had the ball in the back of the net at one point but was offside. Maynard did OK got through a few times and on one was dragged back quite clearly to everyone except the one who mattered. Bishop was hot and cold. Mellis did well. The back 3 and Benning did OK just switched off when it mattered most. Olejnik did OK, logan would have been criticised for 2 of the goals. Rose was a live wire when he came on, won a couple of free kicks. Khan did OK but wasn't involved enough. OSJ came on gave the ball away cheaply a few times but only got 15 minutes,

Don't know whether it's because he's not one of ours he escapes criticism but midfield or centre half Shaughnessy is dire

There's a decent player in there. He showed it early doors but, like the rest of em, he's gone missing.

Indeed, like so many signings he looked good for a match or two and then settled into a more mediocre standard. Judging from today's performance he's not comfortable in defence. But he shouldn't be singled out as the team was poor in general - not so much because of poor individual performances but more as a team. To me it was a "bad" performance, not just "not good". Cheltenham should have been subject to a fierce battle in the second half, but in fact they won at a canter and would probably be happy to play us again tomorrow if it counted for three points more.

Sadly, I think every L2 team would like to play us tomorrow.

[NorthLondonStag]

Spanish Stag - ‘no good deed goes unpunished’ - I was actually defending you if you read the majority of
My post!

[spanishstag]

Spanish Stag - ‘no good deed goes unpunished’ - I was actually defending you if you read the majority of
My post!

I quit when you said i was annoying ,i apologize

[EdwinstoweStag]

Spanish Stag - ‘no good deed goes unpunished’ - I was actually defending you if you read the majority of
My post!

I quit when you said i was annoying ,i apologize

Most of us annoy. This is a by-product of proffering opinion.

[NorthLondonStag]

Spanish Stag - ‘no good deed goes unpunished’ - I was actually defending you if you read the majority of
My post!

I quit when you said i was annoying ,i apologize

Most of us annoy. This is a by-product of proffering opinion.

That’s exactly what my wife says about me

[1975stag]

How many was Logan at fault for today ? ( yes it was Bobby i know )

Get that clown out of that managers job now.....fgs

[spanishstag]

Spanish Stag - ‘no good deed goes unpunished’ - I was actually defending you if you read the majority of
My post!

I quit when you said i was annoying ,i apologize

Most of us annoy. This is a by-product of proffering opinion.

Ah well its not been a great day ,just hanging on for the joshua ,ruiz farce a nice glass of wine,then bed ,as usual sense from you edders ,and from NLS now if only rangers can beat celtic tomorrow

[adamstag]

Show me anything nasty adam ,then i should get banned ,on the other hand your peddling of hate and vitriol ,now to me thats an issue ,anyway done with the lot on here ,only a few sensible posters left ,and you are certainly not one of them ,see you all next season

Sorry I don’t understand the illiteracy and context of that post.

Could you please rephrase in understandable English?

Cheers.

Not a good response, Adam IMHO

That’s nice, but I’m used to working with comprehensible English, so that’s a bit of a shock, it’s like my 4 year old nephew wrote it before bed.

The grammar police could be out in force significantly more on here, but it’s not necessary.

You know what he’s trying to say but you are just taking the proverbial out of him. You may have a greater command of the English language than he does, or at least the punctuation aspects of it, but you should perhaps address his arguments rather than his linguistic failings.

And yes his posts are annoying at times. And actually yours mostly make a lot of sense.

In fairness the poster in question speaks nonsense, then has a go at folk in some form of weird spelling that’s pretty hard to understand then falls into swearing when losing the argument - which is pretty frequent.

When said poster finds it appropriate to frequently have a go at you it’s the least I could do to point out that however things could be for me, I could be him (or her). It’s quite tragic tbh.

[EdwinstoweStag]

Adam - do you mimic people with speech impediments ?

[gavinbrookes]

It's so boring having to wade through all of these personal spats to find half decent content.

[adamstag]

Adam - do you mimic people with speech impediments ?

Are you always a bore?

Just curious, you seem to have really established yourself as a specialist

[The One]

Cut out the abuse please, you are spoiling other uses views.

[The One]

What was the attendance ??

3715 (157 from Cheltenham)

Think someone is juggling the figures, both North and South stands less than 20%full

They forgot to minus 11 who did not turn up.