Manager change YES OR NO...... Board poll added

[gazza1988]

I'm going to put No tomorrow I think.
I don't think we can afford another expensive manager this year.
I don't think we would have Maynard and Cook and Shaugnesey if we'd payed for another proven manager.
It's a business and I believe they are right in what they are trying.
You look at the players we have and you'd think you could pick any side and we would win.
I'm sure it's harder to try and get a point than win away.

The board can't change the mistake they've made but will learn from it.
So from a financial and learning season I would say not yet.
how many back room staff got sacked first 9 games to be replaced by more money and more pay offs.
Lee glover stand up and be counted please.

Financially it's a big No.

I see what you are saying. If I changed the question to "would you want Dempster removed as manager, but by doing so the club are financially crippled?" the poll would have another outcome.

[BH_Stag]

I'm going to put No tomorrow I think.
I don't think we can afford another expensive manager this year.
I don't think we would have Maynard and Cook and Shaugnesey if we'd payed for another proven manager.
It's a business and I believe they are right in what they are trying.
You look at the players we have and you'd think you could pick any side and we would win.
I'm sure it's harder to try and get a point than win away.

The board can't change the mistake they've made but will learn from it.
So from a financial and learning season I would say not yet.
how many back room staff got sacked first 9 games to be replaced by more money and more pay offs.
Lee glover stand up and be counted please.

Financially it's a big No.

I see what you are saying. If I changed the question to "would you want Dempster removed as manager, but by doing so the club are financially crippled?" the poll would have another outcome.

None of us know the details of our finances either.

[gazza1988]

I'm going to put No tomorrow I think.
I don't think we can afford another expensive manager this year.
I don't think we would have Maynard and Cook and Shaugnesey if we'd payed for another proven manager.
It's a business and I believe they are right in what they are trying.
You look at the players we have and you'd think you could pick any side and we would win.
I'm sure it's harder to try and get a point than win away.

The board can't change the mistake they've made but will learn from it.
So from a financial and learning season I would say not yet.
how many back room staff got sacked first 9 games to be replaced by more money and more pay offs.
Lee glover stand up and be counted please.

Financially it's a big No.

I see what you are saying. If I changed the question to "would you want Dempster removed as manager, but by doing so the club are financially crippled?" the poll would have another outcome.

None of us know the details of our finances either.

Indeed. My response was in relation to the idea that financially its a no. If I put that sacking Dempster made the club do a Bury then I don't think anyone would want him sacked.

[wardy12345]

Yes

[lifestags]

Yes

[harryboy]

Please Yes

[oldweststander]

I am sure JD is great with kids football but he doesn't seem able to transfer those skills into the men's game, where points matter more than player development.

[Never easy]

Uuum YES

[Suttonian]

Yes

[The One]

Please ensure you vote in the poll at the header of this thread also.

[yellowstag]

Yes

[spanishstag]

Yes

[yorkshire stag]

just really interested in the reason why the 13 people wouldn’t change manager ?

just wow !!

[spanishstag]

just really interested in the reason why the 13 people wouldn’t change manager ?

just wow !!

Its probably a reluctance to sack someone ,tis not a nice thing to do

[yorkshire stag]

just really interested in the reason why the 13 people wouldn’t change manager ?

just wow !!

Its probably a reluctance to sack someone ,tis not a nice thing to do

‘‘Tis a funny owd job though Football gaffa, on average maybe a two year gig?, your right it is sad however when it’s not working and run out of credible ideas it’s what needs to happen

[spanishstag]

just really interested in the reason why the 13 people wouldn’t change manager ?

just wow !!

Its probably a reluctance to sack someone ,tis not a nice thing to do

‘‘Tis a funny owd job though Football gaffa, on average maybe a two year gig?, your right it is sad however when it’s not working and run out of credible ideas it’s what needs to happen

Think we all know it ,but i certainly dont want to have a sacking party

[HughesyStag89]

IMMEDIATELY

[stags1963]

After Brexit.

[adamstag]

just really interested in the reason why the 13 people wouldn’t change manager ?

just wow !!

Its probably a reluctance to sack someone ,tis not a nice thing to do

‘‘Tis a funny owd job though Football gaffa, on average maybe a two year gig?, your right it is sad however when it’s not working and run out of credible ideas it’s what needs to happen

Think we all know it ,but i certainly dont want to have a sacking party

If you’re bad at your job, you get sacked.

It’s sad but an everyday fact of life. It happens.

Prime ministers get sacked - and they’re technically the most important person in the land.

[Butcherman]

Yes

[gazza1988]

Spanish, its very well know that the job of a football manager is usually very short. Its not a long term gig. Even us, who perhaps has a very patient chairman have changed gaffers fairly often.

[adamstag]

Spanish, its very well know that the job of a football manager is usually very short. Its not a long term gig. Even us, who perhaps has a very patient chairman have changed gaffers fairly often.

But it’s a standard fact of life that football managers get sacked.

Moyes has been sacked from 2 other jobs while still receiving his pay from Man Utd, it’s not always a bad thing.

[spanishstag]

I know what everyone says ,but if it was me i would feel aggrieved if i was given a job and halfway through the given period i was sacked rome wasnt built in a day ,saying that i dont think its going to work for him ,but Im must trying to be fair

[Chrisuknottm]

I know what everyone says ,but if it was me i would feel aggrieved if i was given a job and halfway through the given period i was sacked rome wasnt built in a day ,saying that i dont think its going to work for him ,but Im must trying to be fair

If you're given a job and not up to it any industry, business or walk of life, whatever the original good intentions, then that's the natural order and consequences for failure Spanish

[spanishstag]

I know what everyone says ,but if it was me i would feel aggrieved if i was given a job and halfway through the given period i was sacked rome wasnt built in a day ,saying that i dont think its going to work for him ,but Im must trying to be fair

If you're given a job and not up to it any industry, business or walk of life, whatever the original good intentions, then that's the natural order and consequences for failure Spanish

But do you judge someone on less than half a season ,and no im not saying he should stay ,just trying to be balanced