Manager change YES OR NO...... Board poll added

[madstagman]

Yes

[hucknallstag]

should never have been appointed in the first place,bad decision making....yes

[FarnieStag]

Regrettably yes

[MTFCMusings]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

[tuopolfpilf]

It's a YES from me
Dempster OUT
Awful Negativity Poor Motivation Bore Off

[HitchcocksShins]

7 points off play offs. Just off top of my head: we put our chances away against Salford and not completely capitulate against Leyton Orient and we're up there. There's atleast one more that's not coming to mind right now. Home games have mostly been very frustrating and anger inducing, though. Plenty is being done wrong, players need to shoulder some blame though. Famous last words but Demps will have the rest of the season.

[lancer]

Sorry
Yes

[The One]

7 points off play offs. Just off top of my head: we put our chances away against Salford and not completely capitulate against Leyton Orient and we're up there. There's atleast one more that's not coming to mind right now. Home games have mostly been very frustrating and anger inducing, though. Plenty is being done wrong, players need to shoulder some blame though. Famous last words but Demps will have the rest of the season.

Minus a large number in gate receipts

[Foresttownstag]

7 points off play offs. Just off top of my head: we put our chances away against Salford and not completely capitulate against Leyton Orient and we're up there. There's atleast one more that's not coming to mind right now. Home games have mostly been very frustrating and anger inducing, though. Plenty is being done wrong, players need to shoulder some blame though. Famous last words but Demps will have the rest of the season.

Like the optimism but sadly he has to go.

Our next 6 fixtures are as follows...

Swindon (A)
Cheltenham (H)
Crewe (A)
Northampton (H)
Bradford (A)
Cambridge (A)

How many do you realistically see us getting out of that lot? I can see potentially 6.

This 7 points off the play offs could easily become 12+

[Number63]

Regretfully it's a yes

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=36508

[gazza1988]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

[Number63]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

I think they will need to be a response of about 350 to give about 95% confidence in the result.

[west country stag]

we need JR to say YES now .... job done !!

[MTFCMusings]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

Just interested in their reasoning. If you add the facebook poll which was similarly resounding that makes is around 12% of the home support.

[drewstag]

Yes!

[Martin Shaw]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

Just interested in their reasoning. If you add the facebook poll which was similarly resounding that makes is around 12% of the home support.

Plainly you can't add the two polls in terms of the numbers of people voting, because a lot of the people will be the same. What you can look at is the percentages for yes and no.

[gazza1988]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

I think they will need to be a response of about 350 to give about 95% confidence in the result.

I did a sample size calculator shortly after creating the poll, 4000 people (approximate average home gate and roughly the number of members of this board), 95% confidence and a 5% margin of error gives a sample size of 351.

So yes I think 350 respondants will be very indicative of the views of the fans.

Fairly telling that in the 2 hours or so since put it up theres 100 responders and it's not dropped below 90% yes yet. We shall see how tomorrow goes.

[60+40]

Simple YES or NO everyone, no explanations needed

[MTFCMusings]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

Just interested in their reasoning. If you add the facebook poll which was similarly resounding that makes is around 12% of the home support.

Plainly you can't add the two polls in terms of the numbers of people voting, because a lot of the people will be the same. What you can look at is the percentages for yes and no.

True, but even if you consider everyone who voted on Facebook has also voted on here, it’s 10% ish

[gazza1988]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

Just interested in their reasoning. If you add the facebook poll which was similarly resounding that makes is around 12% of the home support.

Yeah some would want to know to engage in debate, some would create work for us mods.

[MTFCMusings]

I’d be interested to hear from any of the four their reasons for saying no?

Perhaps fear of backlash?

The idea behind the poll is to allow people to vote without having to give reasons why

so far (based on 4000 home fans attendance) only 2% have voted in a few hours. So far it's a 93% yes.

Just interested in their reasoning. If you add the facebook poll which was similarly resounding that makes is around 12% of the home support.

Yeah some would want to know to engage in debate, some would create work for us mods.

That’s your job isn’t it

[60+40]

Please, just a YES or NO

[MTFCMusings]

Please, just a YES or NO

Alright Dictator calm down.

[chip63]

I'm going to put No tomorrow I think.
I don't think we can afford another expensive manager this year.
I don't think we would have Maynard and Cook and Shaugnesey if we'd payed for another proven manager.
It's a business and I believe they are right in what they are trying.
You look at the players we have and you'd think you could pick any side and we would win.
I'm sure it's harder to try and get a point than win away.

The board can't change the mistake they've made but will learn from it.
So from a financial and learning season I would say not yet.
how many back room staff got sacked first 9 games to be replaced by more money and more pay offs.
Lee glover stand up and be counted please.

Financially it's a big No.

[tuopolfpilf]

I'm going to put No tomorrow I think.
I don't think we can afford another expensive manager this year.
I don't think we would have Maynard and Cook and Shaugnesey if we'd payed for another proven manager.
It's a business and I believe they are right in what they are trying.
You look at the players we have and you'd think you could pick any side and we would win.
I'm sure it's harder to try and get a point than win away.

The board can't change the mistake they've made but will learn from it.
So from a financial and learning season I would say not yet.
how many back room staff got sacked first 9 games to be replaced by more money and more pay offs.
Lee glover stand up and be counted please.



Financially it's a big No.

Chip63, I would estimate a loss of £150,000 in gate revenue alone if Dempster stays
Unsure how much extra income the play offs or even promotion would make the club