MTFCMusings wrote:I think he meant Flitcroft's first 17 games, rather than his last surely? Or else his point makes no sense.
EDIT : Just checked, no he definitely meant it as he wrote it. Still not sure of the point!
Ok then let's go with Flitcrofts first 17 games then shall we?
David Flitcrofts first 17 league games yielded 19 points.
John Dempsters first 17 league games have yielded 20 points.
Therefore the facts are that John Dempster has a better points return as manager than what Flitcroft did in their first 17 games & we were in a better position in the league table when Flitcroft came in too. So some of you need to wind your neck in