Amber Andy wrote: WVStag wrote:
dylster wrote: But over the last few weeks that objectiveness has literally disappeared and been replaced by outright abuse.
I'd argue the opposite is true, that a lot of people are finally finding some objectivity instead of the misguided blind faith, which is why the booing is happening.
So how is their new found objectivity helping the club?
To say that those who continue to support the team in the right way have blind faith is nonsense. They are just as frustrated.
Because that's how football fans communicate their unrest and disapproval. If the Radford's pick up on it (which they will have done if they're not completely daft) and remove JD (which they won't, because they're just about daft enough) then I'd say that it's quite productive.
Before someone says 'that's hounding someone out and that's unacceptable', first of all, it's not, and second of all, the fans have a right to boo, to communicate their annoyance at what's going on at the moment. I don't think anyone can argue against the notion that most fans carry that Dempster needs removing.
You'd just rather everyone sit, be smiling and carry on clapping come rain or shine and that's fine for you, Andy, if that's a moral victory for you. But not for literally everyone else.