yorkshire stag wrote:So when are we finally going to get the news from the “in the knows”?
Well this thread is 26 pages long ,so by the time it happens he will be ready for his pension
yorkshire stag wrote:So when are we finally going to get the news from the “in the knows”?
The One wrote:MOTG wrote:The One wrote:oldweststander wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Carolyn has broken her silence with a quote on Instagram : if you don’t like where you are, move. You are not a tree.
Who is the quote meant for JD or the supporters who want him out.
If she is challenging supporters to stay away if they don't like what they see she is playing a very dangerous game.
Dangerous and expensive
Some trees can be moved though
They pine for a move
NG17_stag wrote:Just looking at Flitcroft’s form in 2019, which ultimately got him sacked from his duties.
He won 9 out of 23 games.
Dempster has won 7 out of 26 in all competitions (or 5 out of 19 in the league).
Why does the better record get Flitcroft sacked but not Dempster?
EdwinstoweStag wrote:To paraphrase HRH The Queen, it seems that 2019 has been OUR “annus horibilis”
adamstag wrote:I think there’s a fine line between booing a bad performance and personal abuse where fans go OTT.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with booing a bad performance after a game, nor is anyone who does it a moron or below the average IQ (which some on here seem to humorously allude to ) however, not everyone is the same and if some wish to sit in silence and be satisfied with something below par then good for you and fair enough.
Hopefully, by some miracle they actually manage to not lose on Saturday and we can actually have something positive for once to speak about.
Spiritater wrote:adamstag wrote:I think there’s a fine line between booing a bad performance and personal abuse where fans go OTT.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with booing a bad performance after a game, nor is anyone who does it a moron or below the average IQ (which some on here seem to humorously allude to ) however, not everyone is the same and if some wish to sit in silence and be satisfied with something below par then good for you and fair enough.
Hopefully, by some miracle they actually manage to not lose on Saturday and we can actually have something positive for once to speak about.
It's quite possible to sit in silence and not be satisfied. If we're Ross Dyer I sit in silence and come the whistle just walk out and say nowt. There are more ways of showing dissatisfaction than booing.
adamstag wrote:Spiritater wrote:adamstag wrote:I think there’s a fine line between booing a bad performance and personal abuse where fans go OTT.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with booing a bad performance after a game, nor is anyone who does it a moron or below the average IQ (which some on here seem to humorously allude to ) however, not everyone is the same and if some wish to sit in silence and be satisfied with something below par then good for you and fair enough.
Hopefully, by some miracle they actually manage to not lose on Saturday and we can actually have something positive for once to speak about.
It's quite possible to sit in silence and not be satisfied. If we're Ross Dyer I sit in silence and come the whistle just walk out and say nowt. There are more ways of showing dissatisfaction than booing.
Of course there are pal.
It’s just me stating that folk seem to claim those that boo are in the wrong, when actually why are they?
My point is if the performance is crap and you choose not to boo then fair enough good for you and you shouldn’t get criticised.
My point is there seems to be those that boo who get demonised when those that don’t boo don’t get demonised when in essence you could be attempting to make the same point
WVStag wrote:adamstag wrote:Spiritater wrote:adamstag wrote:I think there’s a fine line between booing a bad performance and personal abuse where fans go OTT.
There is absolutely nothing wrong with booing a bad performance after a game, nor is anyone who does it a moron or below the average IQ (which some on here seem to humorously allude to ) however, not everyone is the same and if some wish to sit in silence and be satisfied with something below par then good for you and fair enough.
Hopefully, by some miracle they actually manage to not lose on Saturday and we can actually have something positive for once to speak about.
It's quite possible to sit in silence and not be satisfied. If we're Ross Dyer I sit in silence and come the whistle just walk out and say nowt. There are more ways of showing dissatisfaction than booing.
Of course there are pal.
It’s just me stating that folk seem to claim those that boo are in the wrong, when actually why are they?
My point is if the performance is crap and you choose not to boo then fair enough good for you and you shouldn’t get criticised.
My point is there seems to be those that boo who get demonised when those that don’t boo don’t get demonised when in essence you could be attempting to make the same point
I agree with this. I respect the people who choose not to boo. We’d all rather not boo. I don’t have time for the self-righteous lot who give it the moral big ‘un because they wont under any circumstance boo and they think that makes them a super fan.
Dan wrote:NG17_stag wrote:Just looking at Flitcroft’s form in 2019, which ultimately got him sacked from his duties.
He won 9 out of 23 games.
Dempster has won 7 out of 26 in all competitions (or 5 out of 19 in the league).
Why does the better record get Flitcroft sacked but not Dempster?
You're for it now
NG17_stag wrote:Dan wrote:NG17_stag wrote:Just looking at Flitcroft’s form in 2019, which ultimately got him sacked from his duties.
He won 9 out of 23 games.
Dempster has won 7 out of 26 in all competitions (or 5 out of 19 in the league).
Why does the better record get Flitcroft sacked but not Dempster?
You're for it now
This post wasn’t in any way backing Dempster, I’d just like to make that clear.
NorthLondonStag wrote:According to them programme notes he’s not going anywhere very soon. Interesting that JR commented that it would cost him a seven figure sum to make a change. Can’t blame him really if he doesn’t want to be put that much of his own money up.
MTFCMusings wrote:Sounds like they've done themselves over on the contracts again. You would think the Chairman and the best CEO would have learned after all the expensive crocks Evans lumbered us with.
gavinbrookes wrote:I think JR's mention of it costing him a near 7-figure sum to change things is telling and is probably the most important part of his statement today.
It helps to put things into perspective but, at the same time, renders his snap decision to appoint a rookie in the summer seem all the more ludicrous! Good intentions he may have, and I believe he does, but JR has made some very questionable decisions as chairman, none more so than appointing JD knowing that he wouldn't be able to afford to change things if the gamble didn't pay off.
I hope we win today and JD can turn things around but fear that the statement today will make post match anger even worse if we are beaten.
Sneag wrote:45 minutes to save his job.
NorthLondonStag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Sounds like they've done themselves over on the contracts again. You would think the Chairman and the best CEO would have learned after all the expensive crocks Evans lumbered us with.
Not necessarily. Remember any new manager wants his own backroom team. So that would probably mean Glover, the Faith Healer and one or two others would need to be paid off, as well as JD.
And then you’ve got to bring a load of people in. That might involve paying compensation to their clubs and agents fees and what have you.
It’s not a cheap business changing manager. Seems simple to us but we ain’t paying.
yellas-derek-yellas wrote:NorthLondonStag wrote:MTFCMusings wrote:Sounds like they've done themselves over on the contracts again. You would think the Chairman and the best CEO would have learned after all the expensive crocks Evans lumbered us with.
Not necessarily. Remember any new manager wants his own backroom team. So that would probably mean Glover, the Faith Healer and one or two others would need to be paid off, as well as JD.
And then you’ve got to bring a load of people in. That might involve paying compensation to their clubs and agents fees and what have you.
It’s not a cheap business changing manager. Seems simple to us but we ain’t paying.
Radford has messed up and he needs to put it right, whatever the price. We are going in the wrong direction and are only 6 points away from relegation.
arsene wengers coat wrote:Has Ben Bradley gone yet too? He's way worse than John Dempster.
arsene wengers coat wrote:Has Ben Bradley gone yet too? He's way worse than John Dempster.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: arsene wengers coat, awalkinthepark, Bing [Bot], bluenyellow, garlic, grufti, mans_field, MTFCMusings, northstandstag, percystag, Scothie the Stag, smulls, Spiritater, YellaFella 75 and 152 guests