Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
Spiritater wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
Two players out from the side that played Oldham, away against a top side. ok it didnt work first half but we got better after tommo n mr no end product were hooked.
Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
Spiritater wrote:but cook's pulled up no trees before fgr 2nd half. hindsight eh
Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
Sedgwick wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
If you think setting up the same as we did against an awful Oldham side against a side that plays football away from home then that would of meant we would of easily won then oh dear how stupid.
Injuries meant he had no choice but the change it and against a side that plays football we set up well, just for 45 we had 9 men on the pitch. Once CJ and Tomlinson bwere gone we was much better. Great away point that. Roll on Tuesday.
Woodclanger 1 wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
If you think setting up the same as we did against an awful Oldham side against a side that plays football away from home then that would of meant we would of easily won then oh dear how stupid.
Injuries meant he had no choice but the change it and against a side that plays football we set up well, just for 45 we had 9 men on the pitch. Once CJ and Tomlinson bwere gone we was much better. Great away point that. Roll on Tuesday.
Are you double Dutch? We set up well with Tommo and CJ in there but we were better when they went off and went 4-4-2, talk about contradicting yourself
Hon Sec wrote:Woodclanger 1 wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Chrisuknottm wrote:Chander Lear wrote:For what was a great point away against a tough side
Folk about commiting suicide at 2 down today.
What about him committing suicide with his first hour tactics after what he achieved against Oldham. Maybe if he'd stuck to how he set the team up then we could have been two up ourselves.
If you think setting up the same as we did against an awful Oldham side against a side that plays football away from home then that would of meant we would of easily won then oh dear how stupid.
Injuries meant he had no choice but the change it and against a side that plays football we set up well, just for 45 we had 9 men on the pitch. Once CJ and Tomlinson bwere gone we was much better. Great away point that. Roll on Tuesday.
Are you double Dutch? We set up well with Tommo and CJ in there but we were better when they went off and went 4-4-2, talk about contradicting yourself
Don’t think he’s talking double Dutch just that two players weren’t up to the role they were trying to play. Better when they were substituted.
Jamie wrote:He got what he went for. Going for a draw clearly didn't work though. It sounds like we were battered and lucky not to be more than 2 down. Great we turned it round but all it showed was his tactics and approach to the game clearly didn't work.
It's a good point overall. Good to keep the confidence up with a 2 goal come back but this does not really do JD any favours. Jury still out and very much split I would say.
The results have turned a corner but the bigger question remains unanswered.
Jamie wrote:He got what he went for. Going for a draw clearly didn't work though. It sounds like we were battered and lucky not to be more than 2 down. Great we turned it round but all it showed was his tactics and approach to the game clearly didn't work.
It's a good point overall. Good to keep the confidence up with a 2 goal come back but this does not really do JD any favours. Jury still out and very much split I would say.
The results have turned a corner but the bigger question remains unanswered.
Sedgwick wrote:Jamie wrote:He got what he went for. Going for a draw clearly didn't work though. It sounds like we were battered and lucky not to be more than 2 down. Great we turned it round but all it showed was his tactics and approach to the game clearly didn't work.
It's a good point overall. Good to keep the confidence up with a 2 goal come back but this does not really do JD any favours. Jury still out and very much split I would say.
The results have turned a corner but the bigger question remains unanswered.
Going for a draw didn't work did it? What was the result again... It's a 90 minute game not just the first half hour.
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], e4d0, IAmTheStag, oldweststander, Stags Head Stags and 134 guests