jake wrote:All these so called potential replacement managers have all got one thing in common, they are unemployed?
I wonder why???
Foresttownstag wrote:jake wrote:All these so called potential replacement managers have all got one thing in common, they are unemployed?
I wonder why???
Are you real?
Phil Parkinson is not unemployed due to Bolton’s position in L1
Sedgwick wrote:Foresttownstag wrote:jake wrote:All these so called potential replacement managers have all got one thing in common, they are unemployed?
I wonder why???
Are you real?
Phil Parkinson is not unemployed due to Bolton’s position in L1
Hasn't he got a promotion from this league and league one?
BH_Stag wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Foresttownstag wrote:jake wrote:All these so called potential replacement managers have all got one thing in common, they are unemployed?
I wonder why???
Are you real?
Phil Parkinson is not unemployed due to Bolton’s position in L1
Hasn't he got a promotion from this league and league one?
2 from League 1 and 1 from League 2 I think. He also took League 2 Bradford to the final of the League Cup, and once in League 1 he got them to the playoffs and an FA Cup quarter final after beating Chelsea away. Obviously Bradford are a huge club at this level, but still fair to say he has a good track record. Would be the best option available to us in my opinion.
bobbystagsfan wrote:BH_Stag wrote:Sedgwick wrote:Foresttownstag wrote:jake wrote:All these so called potential replacement managers have all got one thing in common, they are unemployed?
I wonder why???
Are you real?
Phil Parkinson is not unemployed due to Bolton’s position in L1
Hasn't he got a promotion from this league and league one?
2 from League 1 and 1 from League 2 I think. He also took League 2 Bradford to the final of the League Cup, and once in League 1 he got them to the playoffs and an FA Cup quarter final after beating Chelsea away. Obviously Bradford are a huge club at this level, but still fair to say he has a good track record. Would be the best option available to us in my opinion.
On paper Parkinson is a good name. I am unsure if he plays the silky man city esque football a lot of fans want to see though!
marker_mtfc95 wrote:Disappointed to see he isn’t sacked yet.
nick_stags wrote:
Far from it. He wins games but it wouldn't be great to watch.
bellwhiff wrote:nick_stags wrote:
Far from it. He wins games but it wouldn't be great to watch.
Results trump performances.
If you want attractive with no results then watch Arsenal.
It’s the winning that counts, not the taking part
nick_stags wrote:bellwhiff wrote:nick_stags wrote:
Far from it. He wins games but it wouldn't be great to watch.
Results trump performances.
If you want attractive with no results then watch Arsenal.
It’s the winning that counts, not the taking part
I completely agree with you, but his style of play would divide opinion.
ParisStag wrote:Anyway, successful top of league 2 longball isn't the same as Paul Cox Conference longball. And League 1 longball is better still. It might not be tippy tappy, but as you go higher up the leagues, direct passing is more skilled and easier to watch. I remember that Bradford team and seeing some of their goals and thinking it was pretty good compared to what I was used to from Mansfield. I'd take that now in a heartbeat.
MTFCMusings wrote:nick_stags wrote:bellwhiff wrote:nick_stags wrote:
Far from it. He wins games but it wouldn't be great to watch.
Results trump performances.
If you want attractive with no results then watch Arsenal.
It’s the winning that counts, not the taking part
I completely agree with you, but his style of play would divide opinion.
As someone who is usually opposed to route one football, needs must at the moment unfortunately. Parkinson was successful at Bradford with Hanson and Wells. Cook and Maynard are pretty similar to those two.
Chrisuknottm wrote:ParisStag wrote:Anyway, successful top of league 2 longball isn't the same as Paul Cox Conference longball. And League 1 longball is better still. It might not be tippy tappy, but as you go higher up the leagues, direct passing is more skilled and easier to watch. I remember that Bradford team and seeing some of their goals and thinking it was pretty good compared to what I was used to from Mansfield. I'd take that now in a heartbeat.
Me too Paris but seen on another thread that PP has apparently turned down both Lincoln and Southend in League 1.....if that's true why would he come to Field Mill ?
Chrisuknottm wrote:ParisStag wrote:Anyway, successful top of league 2 longball isn't the same as Paul Cox Conference longball. And League 1 longball is better still. It might not be tippy tappy, but as you go higher up the leagues, direct passing is more skilled and easier to watch. I remember that Bradford team and seeing some of their goals and thinking it was pretty good compared to what I was used to from Mansfield. I'd take that now in a heartbeat.
Me too Paris but seen on another thread that PP has apparently turned down both Lincoln and Southend in League 1.....if that's true why would he come to Field Mill ?
Blackpoolshrimp wrote:If its an average league why aren't you walking it
You can have Bentley if you want
Quite a few managers going to get sacked in next few weeks
Stoke
Mansfield
Morecambe
Hearts
Hibernian
Return to Stagsnet Main Discussion Forum
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Dave Wayne, Phill, skegbymal and 258 guests